Hi All
Is it possible to download a file from a web address using the TCP/UDP
sockets and
an Sbasic program? I've been looking for documentation and programming
examples
with no success.
Hope someone can help.
Malcolm
___
QL-Users Mailing List
I seem to remember these items appearing originally. Are they still used
today, are they still relevant or are they museum pieces. If still in
use
what sort of broardband connection is required, for example, dial up
or broadband and if dial up is that still available !?
Ok, assuming these
George wrote (thank you George ;-)
'5 operating systems for SMSQE v 3.12'
As they say in Liverpool, I can't get me 'ead 'round that.
Would anyone like to climb in and help me please?
Best regards to all
John in Wales
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
That's just what I wanted. Thanks Marcel!!
Malcolm
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Malcolm Lear wrote:
Is it possible to download a file from a web address using the
TCP/UDP sockets and an Sbasic program? I've been looking for
documentation and programming examples with no success.
Yes, it is
Hi Marcel
And if I required a sub page such as 'http://qltoday.com/latest.htm'?
Malcolm
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Malcolm Lear wrote:
Is it possible to download a file from a web address using the
TCP/UDP sockets and an Sbasic program? I've been looking for
documentation and programming
Thanks Marcel, I understand now.
Cheers
Malcolm
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Malcolm Lear wrote:
And if I required a sub page such as 'http://qltoday.com/latest.htm'?
That's the / after GET. Best read the documentation for this,
there's plenty of it on the net.
Marcel
Malcolm Lear wrote:
And if I required a sub page such as 'http://qltoday.com/latest.htm'?
That's the / after GET. Best read the documentation for this,
there's plenty of it on the net.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
Just nosing through my HTTP pocket Reference..
GET /latest.htm HTTP/1.1
Host: qltoday.com
Neil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12 September 2006 14:45:08
Thanks Marcel, I understand now.
Cheers
Malcolm
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Malcolm Lear wrote:
And if I required a sub page such as
Thanks--that's as much as succinctly as I've seen on 'Net-ing the QL... Bill
Cable thought I might give a session at QL-NA in Canada end of the month. I
don't see any way I can leave some emergencies here in town at that time. I had
hoped at least to make it without material for a session but
David McCann wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 11:35 +0100, Neil Riley wrote:
I seem to remember these items appearing originally. Are they still used
today or are they museum pieces?
They were very slow (remember the QL serial port is only capable of 19K
and only reliable for reception at 9K!)
Tony,
The BBS closed down 5 years, I think, no one was using it.
I still have 2 V90 USR modems, which I guess are surplus to
requirements these days as everyone is using PC hardware
and internal PC V90 modem are less then £5
The best option was to have SuperHermes to give the fastest serial
Tony Firshman wrote:
The main problem was that the input handshake (8049 chip) was bugged.
Hermes uses the same basic hardware (but erasable firmware) and Laurence
Reeves simply coded it properly! If only he had worked for Sinclair at
the time we would have had a *much* better QL from the
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:54:03 +0100
Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derek Stewart wrote:
Tony,
The BBS closed down 5 years, I think, no one was using it.
I still have 2 V90 USR modems, which I guess are surplus to
requirements these days as everyone is using PC hardware
Tony Firshman wrote:
I reckon if you run SMSQ on a machine with Godl Card or Super Gold Card
then it would all work OK. It seems SMSQ has easy http support.
Only the QPC variant, unfortunately, as soQL seems to be fairly dead.
There are some open source light-weight TCP/IP stacks available
14 matches
Mail list logo
