I have said this before but Laurence Reeves was a master of
this sort of programming. His QL Forth was under 4k of
machine code I think.
Tony
Why was?
Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Please ignore this.
George
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
On Jan 9, at 15:27 | Jan9, Arnould wrote:
I have said this before but Laurence Reeves was a master of
this sort of programming. His QL Forth was under 4k of
machine code I think.
Tony
Why was?
(8-)#
Slip of the brain.
In today's bloated environment there seems little
Ignored.
Dave
On Jan 9, 2012, at 9:50 AM, gdgqler gdgq...@gmail.com wrote:
Please ignore this.
George
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
___
QL-Users Mailing List
On Jan 10, 2012 4:50 AM, gdgqler gdgq...@gmail.com wrote:
Please ignore this.
George
4/10
While polite, the plea lacked sincerity. Little attention to form or
substance. Better effort required.
-- Andrew
___
QL-Users Mailing List
Please ignore this.
I always have problems with these types of emails. For example, if I
ignore it, I have in actual fact followed the instructions to the letter
and in doing so, cannot possibly have ignored it!
I once had an argument with a college lecturer who handed out an
exam paper
On 09/01/2012 19:42, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Please ignore this.
I always have problems with these types of emails. For example, if I
ignore it, I have in actual fact followed the instructions to the
letter and in doing so, cannot possibly have ignored it!
I once had an argument with a
On Jan 9, at 19:42 | Jan9, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Please ignore this.
I always have problems with these types of emails. For example, if I ignore
it, I have in actual fact followed the instructions to the letter and in
doing so, cannot possibly have ignored it!
I once had an argument
