On 21/06/2020 13:38, Bob Spelten via Ql-Users wrote:
Op Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:46:23 +0200 schreef Norman Dunbar via
Ql-Users :
I have a vague recollection that Simon N Goodwin did something
similar, maybe, in the DIY Toolkit.
I think it was passed a variable and a list of strings, and
If we are talking about Selecting on single-character strings, such as when
coding actions depending on some keypress, I would like to tell you about how I
get around this problem. At the very beginning, I would declare some constants
of the codes of all the alphabetical characters, all 52 of
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 21:04,
ql-users-requ...@lists.q-v-d.com wrote:
Send Ql-Users mailing list submissions to
ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
If we are talking about Selecting on single-character strings, such as when
coding actions depending on some keypress, I would like to tell you about how I
get around this problem. At the very beginning, I would declare some constants
of the codes of all the alphabetical characters, all 52 of
That's probably the best solution for the problem - String$ SELECT has always
been a half-baked solution in SuperBASIC.
Tobias
> Am 21.06.2020 um 13:38 schrieb Bob Spelten via Ql-Users
> :
>
> Op Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:46:23 +0200 schreef Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users
> :
>
>> I have a vague
Op Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:46:23 +0200 schreef Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users
:
I have a vague recollection that Simon N Goodwin did something similar,
maybe, in the DIY Toolkit.
I think it was passed a variable and a list of strings, and returned the
position of the variable in the list.
I have a vague recollection that Simon N Goodwin did something similar, maybe,
in the DIY Toolkit.
I think it was passed a variable and a list of strings, and returned the
position of the variable in the list. Something like that.
Maybe useful?
Cheers,
Norm.
--
Sent from my Android device
I have already tried roughly all the various solutions and obviously we
know very well that they are solutions they don't really know satisfaction.
I also speak from the readability point of view, when you have to get your
hands by modifying the code written years before or written by other
