On 20/08/2011 08:23, Tony Firshman wrote:
On Aug 19, at 21:18 | Aug19, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
In messagea54ce6c7-a769-47d9-aec4-05c877d35...@firshman.co.uk, Tony
Firshmant...@firshman.co.uk writes
On Aug 15, at 21:23 | Aug15, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
In
Does anyone use Word for HTML's?
I agree with your sentiments absolutely.
However when one gets given a complex word file each week for my church's
website it is the only practicable way when the designer *demands* html (8-(#
It works but is horrendous code.
Tony
Does
On 20 Aug 2011, at 12:04, Tony Firshman wrote:
Does anyone use Word for HTML's?
I agree with your sentiments absolutely.
However when one gets given a complex word file each week for my church's
website it is the only practicable way when the designer *demands* html
(8-(#
It
On 19/08/11 22:32, QL-MyLink (f/fh) wrote:
John in Wales
PS Yes, .pdf's!, tif's and more, are up for evaluation.
Given that you are John in Wales, how about Taffs instead of Tifs? ;-)
Cheers,
Norm. (Jocks against Jpegs!)
--
Norman Dunbar
Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd
Registered address:
Norm' (him wots against Jpegs) said -
-
Given that you are John in Wales, how about Taffs instead of Tifs? ;-)
I have some near neighbours (each with a different base-1 OS). They are
famous for their 'tiffs'. The Tales of Wales!
On
