Re: [Ql-Users] Sandy SuperQBoard HD
Dave Park via Ql-Users wrote: As I said in the other place, if you do this and use a WD1772, you might get temperamental results. The VL1772 by VLSI is far more overclockable and runs significantly cooler when double clocked. I read that the "02-02" stepping of the WD1772 can safely do HD, while all others cannot. But I will check how the temperature goes under stress, thanks. I bought a bulk supply of them for SQBv4 ;) Looking forward to it :) Marcel Me too!!! ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] Sandy SuperQBoard HD
Dave Park via Ql-Users wrote: > As I said in the other place, if you do this and use a WD1772, you might > get temperamental results. The VL1772 by VLSI is far more overclockable and > runs significantly cooler when double clocked. I read that the "02-02" stepping of the WD1772 can safely do HD, while all others cannot. But I will check how the temperature goes under stress, thanks. > I bought a bulk supply of them for SQBv4 ;) Looking forward to it :) Marcel ___ QL-Users Mailing List
