Re: [Ql-Users] toolkit-ii-the-sequel and CDEC$

2017-03-24 Thread Ralf Reköndt 
Ah, that reminds me of writing bugs to TT, but that was only possible with 
letters to King Street, Rampton, so took a bit longer than today.


Keep up the good work!

- Original Message - 
From: "Marcel Kilgus"



Michael Bulford wrote:

There seems to be a problem with CDEC$.
CDEC$(123,4,0) should give " 123", but gives instead 4 asterisks.


Confirmed, that one is on me. I will hold back with the update a bit
in case you find some more ;-)

Marcel 


___
QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] toolkit-ii-the-sequel and CDEC$

2017-03-24 Thread Marcel Kilgus 
Michael Bulford wrote:
> There seems to be a problem with CDEC$.
> CDEC$(123,4,0) should give " 123", but gives instead 4 asterisks.

Confirmed, that one is on me. I will hold back with the update a bit
in case you find some more ;-)

Marcel


___
QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] toolkit-ii-the-sequel and CDEC$

2017-03-24 Thread Michael Bulford 
There seems to be a problem with CDEC$.
CDEC$(123,4,0) should give " 123", but gives instead 4 asterisks.

Michael
___
QL-Users Mailing List