Re: [Ql-Users] [Fwd: Re: Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS]

2009-10-15 Thread P Witte
Marcel Kilgus writes: Ive had a blocked pipe in my qlusers system somewhere. Just had the odd mail until today when I got 107 all at once! P Witte wrote: Of course this isnt half as clever as it looks, as nowadays you arnt guaranteed (AFAIK) that ALCHP wont return a negative address. Is

Re: [Ql-Users] [Fwd: Re: Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS]

2009-10-04 Thread gdgqler
On 3 Oct 2009, at 13:37, John Gilpin wrote: I understand that there is no need to compile BASIC programs when using QPC2 (SMSQ) - the SBASIC code can be EXEC'd without TURBO or QLIBERATOR. Do I take this to mean that I just Ex win1_program_bas ? And if it's as easy as that,

Re: [Ql-Users] [Fwd: Re: Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS]

2009-10-04 Thread gdgqler
On 3 Oct 2009, at 17:03, P Witte wrote: As it is not widely advertised and the documentation is hard to find, I thought I should just mention that as of SMSQ/E 3.06 the QUIT keyword takes an optional longword parameter. Earlier versions will simply ignore this A useful bit of information.

Re: [Ql-Users] [Fwd: Re: Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS]

2009-10-04 Thread François Van Emelen
gdgqler schreef: On 3 Oct 2009, at 17:03, P Witte wrote: As it is not widely advertised and the documentation is hard to find, I thought I should just mention that as of SMSQ/E 3.06 the QUIT keyword takes an optional longword parameter. Earlier versions will simply ignore this A useful bit

[Ql-Users] [Fwd: Re: Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS]

2009-10-03 Thread John Gilpin
Hi everyone, this email was sent to the users list on 30/09/09 21:59 but doesn't seem to have arrived so here it is again. Still hoping someone can help me with my BASIC problems. Regards, John Gilpin. Original Message Subject:Re: [Ql-Users] Help with

Re: [Ql-Users] [Fwd: Re: Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS]

2009-10-03 Thread Rich Mellor
Original Message Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:59:40 +0100 From: John Gilpin johngilpin...@btinternet.com To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com References: 4ac21f89.8050...@btinternet.com

Re: [Ql-Users] [Fwd: Re: Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS]

2009-10-03 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I understand that there is no need to compile BASIC programs when using QPC2 (SMSQ) - the SBASIC code can be EXEC'd without TURBO or QLIBERATOR. Do I take this to mean that I just Ex win1_program_bas ? And if it's as easy as that, what are the benefits and drawbacks of doing this?

Re: [Ql-Users] [Fwd: Re: Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS]

2009-10-03 Thread Bob Spelten
Op Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:37:11 +0200 schreef John Gilpin thegilp...@btinternet.com: I understand that there is no need to compile BASIC programs when using QPC2 (SMSQ) - the SBASIC code can be EXEC'd without TURBO or QLIBERATOR. Do I take this to mean that I just Ex win1_program_bas?And if

Re: [Ql-Users] [Fwd: Re: Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS]

2009-10-03 Thread François Van Emelen
John Gilpin schreef: SNIP Don't go away guys, this is just the beginning of my program review (taking my old BASIC code from my Aurora/SGC set-up and running it on QPC2), I am certain to need your help again later. And just to prove this point, can anyone guide me on the following: I

Re: [Ql-Users] [Fwd: Re: Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS]

2009-10-03 Thread P Witte
Bob Spelten writes: Op Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:37:11 +0200 schreef John Gilpin thegilp...@btinternet.com: I understand that there is no need to compile BASIC programs when using QPC2 (SMSQ) - the SBASIC code can be EXEC'd without TURBO or QLIBERATOR. Do I take this to mean that I just Ex

Re: [Ql-Users] [Fwd: Re: Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS]

2009-10-03 Thread P Witte
I wrote: 1 REMark Example of QUIT 2 REMark Using own error message 3 REMark by pjwitte 2009 4 : 100 addr = ALCHP(100) 110 erm$ = 'something got seriously buggered here..' CHR$(10) 120 POKE_W addr, LEN(erm$), erm$ 130 er = BIN('1' BIN$(addr, 32)(2 TO)) 140 REMark La di da 150 QUIT er 160