Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-20 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
Dave Walker wrote: All, I am not sure if the XTC68 will work with long filenames or not.There is no such limitation built into the C68 part of the source, but it might be a limitation of the fact that it is compiled as a DOS console application at the Visual Studio level? XTC68 (NT)

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-17 Thread Tony Firshman
Anton Preinsack wrote, On 16/10/09 22:42: I would love to have a QL-emulator on my iPhone! The problem is, that Apple don´t allow applications, which are able to run other code (like a QL emulator would do with QL programs). There were huge problems with the C64 emulator, too. The authors

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-16 Thread Norman Dunbar
Hi Derek, Is QT a good platform, I used to dabble a little in Linux. I like it, Dave Walker thinks it's a little harder to program that .net - I have no idea as I don't program .net. There are bots of QT that take a while to get your head around. It is, in many places, less easy to figure out

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-16 Thread Norman Dunbar
Evening Dave, QT might produce a portable result, but it is much harder to program. Well, I like it but I have to admit to not programming in .net (any language) so I can't really compare. It's a wee bit harder than Borland C++ Builder, for instance, but I like it. I have a couple of program

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-16 Thread Dave Walker
17:01 To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources Hi Derek, Is QT a good platform, I used to dabble a little in Linux. I like it, Dave Walker thinks it's a little harder to program that .net - I have no idea as I don't program .net. There are bots of QT that take a while to get

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-16 Thread Dilwyn Jones
While I am at it, is there any interest in one of the QL emulators running on the iPhone/iTouch? I have been thinking of looking at porting one of them for some time. Dave I've been asked a couple of times if any of the QL emulators can run on such a system. This would definitely open up a

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-16 Thread Anton Preinsack
I would love to have a QL-emulator on my iPhone! The problem is, that Apple don´t allow applications, which are able to run other code (like a QL emulator would do with QL programs). There were huge problems with the C64 emulator, too. The authors had to remove C64 Basic and the emulator

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-16 Thread Dave Walker
Preinsack Sent: 16 October 2009 22:43 To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources I would love to have a QL-emulator on my iPhone! The problem is, that Apple don´t allow applications, which are able to run other code (like a QL emulator would do with QL programs). There were huge

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-15 Thread Adrian D. Ives
Hello Dave, No, I didn't realize that XTC68 was the same thing as C68. That's why I enquired about the source ;) There is, of course, no need to produce a graphic front end as there are several freeware C development IDEs out there that could be pressed into service for this

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-15 Thread Dave Walker
of looking at porting one of them for some time. Dave -Original Message- From: ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com [mailto:ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com] On Behalf Of Derek Stewart Sent: 15 October 2003 08:21 To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources Hi Adrian, I would

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-15 Thread Tony Firshman
Dave Walker wrote, On 15/10/09 10:04: All, I am not sure if the XTC68 will work with long filenames or not.There is no such limitation built into the C68 part of the source, but it might be a limitation of the fact that it is compiled as a DOS console application at the Visual Studio level?

[Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-14 Thread Adrian D. Ives
Does anyone know where I can get hold of the source for this c68 cross compiler? I have the DOS/NT/UNIX binaries, but I'm interested in updating it to run under Win32. As an aside, I recently finished migrating an MK14 emulator to run under Vista. It's nothing spectacular, but it does have a

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-14 Thread Dave Walker
-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources Does anyone know where I can get hold of the source for this c68 cross compiler? I have the DOS/NT/UNIX binaries, but I'm interested in updating it to run under Win32. As an aside, I recently finished migrating an MK14 emulator to run under Vista

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-14 Thread Adrian D. Ives
October 2009 09:17 DW To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com DW Subject: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources DW Does anyone know where I can get hold of the source for this c68 cross DW compiler? I have the DOS/NT/UNIX binaries, but I'm interested in updating it DW to run under Win32. DW As an aside, I recently finished

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-14 Thread Dave Walker
Message- From: ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com [mailto:ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com] On Behalf Of Adrian D. Ives Sent: 14 October 2009 10:08 To: Dave Walker Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources Dave, Firstly, I'm not implying anything. I didn't mean to cause so much offence by my request

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-14 Thread Neil Riley
the existing binaries? DW Dave DW -Original Message- DW From: ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com DW [mailto:ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com] On Behalf Of Adrian D. Ives DW Sent: 14 October 2009 09:17 DW To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com DW Subject: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources DW Does anyone know where I

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-14 Thread Norman Dunbar
Evening all, ... As I said if you were interested in producing a Windows graphic front-end then feel free to go ahead. It should not be very hard to do using Microsoft .NET toolset. Or, even beter QT! Cheers, Norman. ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-14 Thread Dave Walker
Norman, QT might produce a portable result, but it is much harder to program. DAve -Original Message- From: ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com [mailto:ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com] On Behalf Of Norman Dunbar Sent: 14 October 2009 21:56 To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users

Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources

2009-10-14 Thread Dave Walker
October 2003 23:25 To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Sources Is QT a good platform, I used to dabble a little in Linux. I assume there is a Windows version... How about a QL version Derek Norman Dunbar wrote: Evening all, ... As I said if you were interested