Arnould wrote:
AND anyway I do not know if Marcel could be interested. Marcel?
I was, but soon I will probably not have the time anymore.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Doug L. wrote:
\snip
I would be interested in taking a look at whether any of the current near-Net
able packages come close to getting a moderately enhanced QL on the Net. As I
remember, SoQL is one and may get further work so as to come closer to being
truly Net-enabled. But it's my
.
Derek
- Original Message -
From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: QL Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Is Goldfire vapourware?
Good luck with your Goldfire quest, Tarquin.
One thing which was obvious at this weekend's Quanta
... but it seems to be a very long term project.
In a few words:
I was there, in Croatia, in May 2004 and Summer 2005. I intend to go
again this summer. My project is: I want Nasta to make a very low
cost QL. At this moment I am not really interested to see a QL
based on the very latest
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Arnould
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Clip
The fact is that Nasta is certainly our man to do the hardware, but
right now he must live and he has already too much to do for his
employer. Because he currently develops electronics not based on his
knowledge of the QL and
Good luck with your Goldfire quest, Tarquin.
One thing which was obvious at this weekend's Quanta meeting in
Manchester was the prevailing view that native QL hardware will play
less and less of a part in our QLing lives in the future. Almost
everyone seemed to
be of the opinion that emulators
