Thank's a lot. And you are a lucky man : you survive a Windows crash ;-)
-Message d'origine-
De : Phoebus R. Dokos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : samedi 5 janvier 2002 05:30
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [ql-users] A correction for Claude
Claude,
I see on Thierry's smsq.free.fr
John In Wales (wrote)
I was amused to hear someone say recently
If it wasn't for bad luck, I'd have no luck at all!
and Robert's
hastily rushes back to shallow end of pool :-)
sure made me smile!
As it did I. =8-)
I take it from recent posts that W98 is not the ideal platform
for
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002 at 01:32:00, Dexter wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Tony Firshman wrote:
Even better, in our conversation I talked about superHermes. That is
(as you Dexter may not know) a plug in replacement for the 8749.
Yes, I visited your site and looked at
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002 at 01:06:39, ZN wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
It's nice to see the group being so active once again, though I have to
confess I'm actually postponing an email to my family just to answer this
(hopefully the won't disown me if they ever find out :-) ).
[Replacement
I take it from recent posts that W98 is not the ideal platform
for QPC2 and SMSQ/E? Or anything else it seems, by my
experience lately.
Dennis
N9VRB
ICQ# 801900
Not necessarily. I still use WIndows 95 because my PC is quite old and
I suspect anything more recent would cripple it.
Some
snip
fonts. Another possibility is the PDA like devices. Tony Tebby
himself had
ideas along these lines, with a neat concept called the ATAB. Which,
BTW
would be well worth investing some design ime into...
Nasta
Arnould Nazarian gave me some insight into this at QL2000 and it was a
very
I take it from recent posts that W98 is not the ideal platform
for QPC2 and SMSQ/E? Or anything else it seems, by my
experience lately.
Dennis
N9VRB
ICQ# 801900
Not necessarily. I still use WIndows 95 because my PC is quite
old and
I suspect anything more recent would cripple it.
I
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 10:58:08PM +, Dexter wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Peter Graf wrote:
PCI instead of ISA on Q40/Q60 would give you:
*No* expandability under QDOS/SMS at all.
Peter, thanks for explaining where the problem lies...
Could you just fill things out a little
Oh and of course Peter is correct: I never did and never will tell anyone
how to choose a QL system, or what to run their QL software on. All I did
and I am guilty as charge was say that I don't believe that QPC is a QL
system in its own right. I do respect democracy too much else my name
Hi Arnould,
Schools are very risk averse, and a difficult market to sell into. They
have many special needs: high durability, long live, unbreakable, cheap,
cheap or zero cost upgrade cycles, and transparent (to clearly show the
principles being taught.
In my mind, schools are not the
I just tried to compile and run UQLX on a LART (www.lart.tudelft.nl) with
no success, mainly because the LART doesn't have any video hardware I
think.
I have a RiscPC which does have the necessary video hardware, and I have a
prototype ARM7500FE-based board here that's almost finished - I just
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002 at 22:24:17, P Witte wrote:
(ref: 000e01c19637$d1395e10$0100a8c0@gamma)
If were thinking about a future for the QL in line with its promising
beginnings something entirely different is called for than trying to catch
up with mainstream. The QL isnt a PC; its a computer! We
12 matches
Mail list logo
