RE: [ql-users] Looking for advice

2002-03-25 Thread Norman Dunbar
-Original Message- From: Tony Firshman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] - Which I still have to this very day - although Tony has had his hands on it a couple of times ... but way back in August 1991, with a guarantee repair a few months later (8-)# Looks like (with the exception of one

Re: [ql-users] Source Code Status

2002-03-25 Thread wlenerz
On 25 Mar 2002, at 8:37, Jerome Grimbert wrote: No need to twist my arms, I will gladly help. Yippeee! Yes, as long as you can redistribute the work to someone with the right platform, in order to keep everybody going in the same direction, even if sometime some platforms are a step

Re: [ql-users] Eindhoven

2002-03-25 Thread Darren . Branagh
Dilwyn Wrote:- Go ahead come too :-) Not sure Patientline (my employer) will let me. They seem to be sending me everywhere but where I want to go at the moment - 4 of us being sent from N.Wales most of next week to help out in Edinburgh, we heard last thing this afternoon. Now, no

Re: [ql-users] Source Code Status

2002-03-25 Thread John Hall
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: 5/ Any person may make any change to the source code he feels like. Any person may give away to others the modificaton he thus made, including the official distribution in source code form only, provided this is made ENTIRELY FOR FREE - no charges, not even copying

[ql-users] Aurora and SuperHermes Lite Manuals

2002-03-25 Thread Phoebus Dokos
Hi all, I converted the Aurora and superHermes Lite manuals to PDF format. If anyone wants them let me know. These are 512Kb and 82.5Kb in size respectively. Phoebus

Re: [ql-users] Looking for advice - Use Sernet

2002-03-25 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Derek Stewart wrote: If you use SIMSER extensions you can add serial port extensions to the QDOS serial ports, it will allow a standard QL to use Sernet, but only at 9600 baud. I have now put a copy of the SimSer extensions to allow one directional serial port operation with SMSQ/E style SRX and

Re: [ql-users] Eindhoven discussions ??

2002-03-25 Thread Arnould Nazarian
Please be patient, something is coming. Arnould Joachim Van der Auwera wrote: So, what with the discussions about SMSQ/E... What kind of conclusions have been reached (or not). I can't be the only one being curious about this ? -- Joachim Van der Auwera http://www.progs.be/

Re: [ql-users] serials

2002-03-25 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Thank you, Tony, I'll put this on the website and possibly in Toady to help people out. I knew I should not have done it so late. Pinouts are right, but directions are worng. This should be OK (but I am not laying my life on - I am still tired (8-)# )

Re: [ql-users] Aurora Manual

2002-03-25 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Nasta wrote: Tony, would you mind sending it to me too? I am ashamed to admit it, but I don't have the complete manual :-( I'll convert it to PDF and add to the Aurora archive on QLhardware... he he - and you wrote it (8-)# URL:http://www.firshman.demon.co.uk/aurora.zip Sorry Phoebus, I should

Re: [ql-users] Source Code Status

2002-03-25 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Following the discussions at EIndhoven,here is what has been agreed upon, Tony TEBBY also having agreed to it: This is good news, a positive step forward. And having someone as highly regarded as you in the QL world as registrar will be a popular move I am sure. I HOPE you can agree with this.

Re: [ql-users] Aurora and SuperHermes Lite Manuals

2002-03-25 Thread Dilwyn Jones
If Tony is happy, these could be held with the rest of my manuals-on-disk to provide replacement manuals for those needing them, and a one-stop source of QL documentation. Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.soft.net.uk/dj/index.html -Original Message- From: Phoebus Dokos [EMAIL

Re: [ql-users] Eindhoven

2002-03-25 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Don't know what it is about Dilwyn and PC's - they just hate each other. Huh. Don't mention that word after this evening's performance. I'm off to Scotland tomorrow to work for the rest of the week. Have bene trying since I came home to (1) compile stuff for QL Toady (2) emails (3) website

Re: [ql-users] Aurora and SuperHermes Lite Manuals

2002-03-25 Thread Tony Firshman
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 at 14:52:21, Dilwyn Jones wrote: (ref: 003d01c1ce91$d0d22fa0$33065cc3@default) If Tony is happy, these could be held with the rest of my manuals-on-disk to provide replacement manuals for those needing them, and a one-stop source of QL documentation. No problem with sH.

Re: [ql-users] Source Code Status

2002-03-25 Thread Tony Firshman
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 at 15:29:17, Dilwyn Jones wrote: (ref: 004001c1ce91$d33f3800$33065cc3@default) Following the discussions at EIndhoven,here is what has been agreed upon, Tony TEBBY also having agreed to it: This is good news, a positive step forward. And having someone as highly regarded as

Re: [ql-users] Aurora and SuperHermes Lite Manuals

2002-03-25 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 05:31 ìì 25/3/2002, you wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 at 14:52:21, Dilwyn Jones wrote: (ref: 003d01c1ce91$d0d22fa0$33065cc3@default) If Tony is happy, these could be held with the rest of my manuals-on-disk to provide replacement manuals for those needing them, and a one-stop source of QL

[ql-users] Aurora and superHermes Lite Manuals

2002-03-25 Thread Phoebus Dokos
Hi all, you can now find the Aurora and superHermes Lite manuals on my provisional page: http://www.dokos-gr.net/~phoebus/ Just follow the link on the top or bottom :-) -or- if you are like me and like to get things done fast: For the aurora manual:

Re: [ql-users] Source Code Status

2002-03-25 Thread wlenerz
On 18 Mar 2002, at 15:29, Dilwyn Jones wrote: This is good news, a positive step forward. And having someone as highly regarded as you in the QL world as registrar will be a popular move I am sure. Thanks for the vote of confidence. I suspect you'll get more 'hate mail' for the length

Re: [ql-users] Source Code Status

2002-03-25 Thread Jerome Grimbert
Tony Firshman makes some magical things to make me read } I have understood the bit about no charge in giving copies. As someone } running a PD library I'll mention here I'm happy to adhere strictly by } this. } I was surprised that media/post costs were vetoed I must admit. } Surely that is a

[ql-users] dot org

2002-03-25 Thread Antonio Tavares Lopes
Freshly checked at network solutions: both smsq.org and smsqe.org are available. Is there any interest in the community to grab it? Most probably I won't be of any help for the huge tasks to come, but would gladly donate the domain registration of one of those.