In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
Whatever it is, I don't think it's QPC. SBASIC is very platform
independent. The only thing which is possible is that the SMSQ
floating point functions have a bug whereas the QPC ones haven't.
Knowing
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
Are the earlier versions of SMSQ/E that different ? Or is it QPC2 that
is masking the problem by not going 'fatal' ?
Whatever it is, I don't think it's QPC. SBASIC is very platform
independent. The
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to Marcel, I had a proper look and think about what I was doing.
The moral is not to transfer SBASIC program as _sav files but as text
files. Silly me!
Christopher Cave
Christopher Cave wrote:
[fatal error in SBASIC interpreter]
The message can have many meanings, it's generally used when things
are checked which are never supposed to go wrong anyway (at least
better than just crashing or whatever). As generic functions like
convert expression to operation
