I guess that's why he didn't include 'shorter' :O)
> > try assembler - it is easier, readable, maintainable and faster.
I agree with the four qualities that were mentioned though.
Ian.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: swensont
> Sent: 31 May 2001 16:10
> To: ql-users
> Cc: swensont
> Subject: Re: [ql-users] sb2htm
>
>
> On May 31, 11:31am, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [ql-users] sb2htm
> > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:09:48PM +0100, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>
> > > I'm not an assembly writer ... although I will try Perl,
> some day, when
> > > I get the time :-(
> >
> > try assembler - it is easier, readable, maintainable and faster.
> >
> > Richard
>
> Assembler easier than Perl? Boy do I have to disagree with
> you on that one.
> A few lines of Perl can do more than a hundred lines of
> Assembly, esp. using
> regular expressions. I do hope your tongue was firmly
> planted in your cheek
> when you wrote that.
>
> Tim Swenson
>
>
Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
