Re: [ql-users] BetterBasic and CrossRef

2001-03-05 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 5 Mar 2001, at 9:56, Timothy Swenson wrote: > The problem is that BetterBasic did not come with a manual and CrossRef only > came with a short one. Does anyone have an electronic version of either of > these manuals? Since the code is in the PD, does this also apply to the > manual? Not

Re: [ql-users] BetterBasic and CrossRef

2001-03-05 Thread Timothy Swenson
Robert, If you could send what you have in plain ASCII that will give me a good start. Anybody know if the manuals were part of the deal when Chas Dillon released the source code to these programs? Or should I not worry? Tim Swenson

Re: [ql-users] BetterBasic and CrossRef

2001-03-05 Thread Robert Newson
> The problem is that BetterBasic did not come with a manual and CrossRef only > came with a short one. Does anyone have an electronic version of either of > these manuals? Since the code is in the PD, does this also apply to the > manual? Or does anyone care? I only have the BetterBasic upda

[ql-users] BetterBasic and CrossRef

2001-03-05 Thread Timothy Swenson
Since BetterBasic and CrossRef by Chas Dillon have been released into the PD, I'm thinking about recompiling them with the new Turbo and making them available. I've recompiled BetterBasic and it against some code and it seemed to work fine. The problem is that BetterBasic did not come with a man