Re: [ql-users] What printers do people use with their QL??

2003-10-13 Thread Darren . Branagh
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately at

Re: [ql-users] Bugs

2003-10-13 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Jerome Grimbert wrote: Is there any uptodate Web page listing the know/resolved bugs with version (sort of changes.txt, with pending bugs listed as extra). Normally http://www.kilgus.net/qpc/versionssms.html should be up-to-date (though due to some special circumstances this time it isn't yet.

Re: [ql-users] Bugs

2003-10-13 Thread Jerome Grimbert
Marcel Kilgus makes some magical things to make me read } } Jerome Grimbert wrote: } Is there any uptodate Web page listing the know/resolved bugs with version } (sort of changes.txt, with pending bugs listed as extra). } } Normally http://www.kilgus.net/qpc/versionssms.html should be }

Re: [ql-users] QLwIP, Ethernet, USB, Q60 successor

2003-10-13 Thread wlenerz
On 11 Oct 2003 at 23:17, Peter Graf wrote: (...) Q60 Successor: (...) After the departure of Tony Tebby, I see no basis for projects like this anymore, because there's no common ground with the new SMSQ/E maintainers, Well of course not, you never tried to find one. and at the same

Re: [ql-users] Bugs

2003-10-13 Thread wlenerz
On 13 Oct 2003 at 8:51, Jerome Grimbert wrote: Is there any uptodate Web page listing the know/resolved bugs with version (sort of changes.txt, with pending bugs listed as extra). No, not to my knowledge. I do keep a list of bugs that are sent to me/published here on the list. Yours will be

Re: [ql-users] QLwIP, Ethernet, USB, Q60 successor

2003-10-13 Thread Jerome Grimbert
Fabrizio Diversi makes some magical things to make me read } Just a thought about what a pity,( I am now in the lunch break...) } one year later after sms/e sources new license, and for a lot of reason that I do not understand (!!) nothing was done on the Q40 side, not because missing of

Re: [ql-users] Bugs

2003-10-13 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Jerome Grimbert wrote: I have not yet seen the block operation in C for 24 bits colours... http://www.itimpi.freeserve.co.uk/ql/gd2b.zip iow_blkt ( chanid_t channel, timeout_t timeout, GDSTP_t *, QLRECT_t *rect) Means I will have to enter debug/patch kernel mode before continuing the

Re: [ql-users] What printers do people use with their QL??

2003-10-13 Thread gwicks
- Original Message - From: Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] What printers do people use with their QL?? My solution regarding postscript would also very much solve the problem for Qxx. SGC is probably too slow or doesn't have enough memory to run Ghostscript.

Re: [ql-users] What printers do people use with their QL??

2003-10-13 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos ( . )
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:56:26 +0100, gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] What printers do people use with their QL?? My solution regarding postscript would also very much solve the problem for Qxx. SGC is

Re: [ql-users] QLwIP, Ethernet, USB, Q60 successor

2003-10-13 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos ( . )
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:48:32 +0200 (MET DST), Jerome Grimbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fabrizio Diversi makes some magical things to make me read } Just a thought about what a pity,( I am now in the lunch break...) } one year later after sms/e sources new license, and for a lot of reason that

Re: [ql-users] QLwIP, Ethernet, USB, Q60 successor

2003-10-13 Thread John Taylor
Well I think that this whole discussion is an overkill. We did it before but it may be useful to see things a little more removed from the heat now :-) Phoebus Mutual admiration societies achieve nothing. There are differences of opinion in almost all aspects of QL computing. The 'licence'

Re: [ql-users] QLwIP, Ethernet, USB, Q60 successor

2003-10-13 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos ( . )
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 21:35:50 +0100, John Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I think that this whole discussion is an overkill. We did it before but it may be useful to see things a little more removed from the heat now :-) Phoebus Mutual admiration societies achieve nothing. There are

Re: [ql-users] QLwIP, Ethernet, USB, Q60 successor

2003-10-13 Thread Peter Graf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11 Oct 2003 at 23:17, Peter Graf wrote: (...) Q60 Successor: (...) After the departure of Tony Tebby, I see no basis for projects like this anymore, because there's no common ground with the new SMSQ/E maintainers, Well of course not, you never tried to find

Re: [ql-users] QLwIP, Ethernet, USB, Q60 successor

2003-10-13 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos ( . )
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 23:41:37 +0200, Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Nobody is stopping anybody from releasing a piece of code under 2 licenses. That is not possible under any legal agreement. It's other one or the other especially for GPL style licenses as the premise is so

Re: [ql-users] QLwIP, Ethernet, USB, Q60 successor

2003-10-13 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Phoebus R. Dokos (F??ß?? ?. ?t) wrote: That is not possible under any legal agreement. It's other one or the other especially for GPL style licenses as the premise is so different that it is impossible to do so. I can release my software under any number of licences I chose to do. I can