Peter Graf a écrit:
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
The software Peter is producing seems too important (...)
Not if it isn't made available.
Which is only true if my offer is rejected. I therefore conclude that
keeping SMSQ/E from from the GPL has a much higher priority (for
Wolfgang Co.) than
In a message dated 19/03/2004 19:41:39 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I see
it the current licence is only a security for TT: if an unknown
organisation did make money with SMSQ/E, there would be an argument to
get something for him. IMHO he deserves it. Please
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed, but the problem is that if someone converted Peter's work to run
under SMSQ/e and it does involve changes to the operating system. Why? Because
the GPL says that any future changes must also be released under the GPL
licence terms
In a message dated 19/03/2004 23:16:57 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Agreed, but the problem is that if someone converted Peter's work to
run under SMSQ/e and it does involve changes to the operating
system. Why? Because the GPL says that any future
changes must
