RE: [ql-users] Status of QPC1

2003-09-10 Thread Dave
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phoebus R. Dokos (Öïßâïò Ñ. Íôüêïò) Sent: 09 September 2003 21:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] Status of QPC1 On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:22:44 +0100, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm again! Well, I could

Re: [ql-users] Status of QPC1

2003-09-10 Thread Roy wood
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Thanks very much for the reply and offer(?) I'd be really glad to return to QLing albeit onna XP machine. I will be delighted to return to the wrangling necessary to get a DOS program to run in a DozyDosBox.. How can I acquire the

[ql-users] Status of QPC1

2003-09-09 Thread Darren . Branagh
Hi Guys, I asked this question at the recent Irish QL get together - what is the status of QPC1? I know it is no longer actively supported and updated, but its still a useful program, and one I still use on an old 486 PC with a tiny hard disk to test software on - no windows installed, it

Re: [ql-users] Status of QPC1

2003-09-09 Thread Darren . Branagh
: Sent by: Subject: Re: [ql-users] Status of QPC1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] g.uk

RE: [ql-users] Status of QPC1

2003-09-09 Thread Dave
Hmmm. seems my memory ain't what it use to be; please, remind me what is/was QPC1? Regards, Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcel Kilgus Sent: 09 September 2003 17:13 To: ql-users Subject: Re: [ql-users] Status of QPC1

RE: [ql-users] Status of QPC1

2003-09-09 Thread Darren . Branagh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] userve.comcc: Sent by: Subject: RE: [ql-users] Status of QPC1

Re: [ql-users] Status of QPC1

2003-09-09 Thread Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry Marcel - just thought Roy or Jochen might know as they might be selling it :-)) Roy was at the Irish meeting and Jochen doesn't read the list most of the time... ;-) not to mention SMSQ/E, which is now no longer commercial. Not entirely true. QPC1 on a

Re: [ql-users] Status of QPC1

2003-09-09 Thread Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Basically a much less impressive version that ran only under DOS and wasn't a windows application It was written at a time when Windows 3.1 was still state of the art. Plus a lot of the newer QPC2 features are missing - such as QPC_EXEC, the DOS device, and high

Re: [ql-users] Status of QPC1

2003-09-09 Thread Dave Walker
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:27 PM Subject: RE: [ql-users] Status of QPC1 Hmmm. seems my memory ain't what it use to be; please, remind me what is/was QPC1? Regards, Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcel

RE: [ql-users] Status of QPC1

2003-09-09 Thread Dave
] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 September 2003 17:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] Status of QPC1 Sorry Marcel - just thought Roy or Jochen might know as they might be selling it :-)) I think there is a market for it as a way of attracting new QL users if available very