Can anyone help me with an address or other contact details for Alan
Horsley, somewhere in Yorkshire (I think from memory it might be
Doncaster). I need to send him a CD but his letter arrived a bit
damaged and I couldn't make out the address.
TIA
--
Dilwyn Jones
--
No virus found in this
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] A4 or A5
At the other end of the scale, this mag I put on my site for another
church:
http://allsaintsberkhamsted.org.uk/newsletter/2005/06/newsletter.pdf
is
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 at 18:55:43, gwicks wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message - From: Tony Firshman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] A4 or A5
At the other end of the scale, this mag I put on my site for another
church:
In summary I can only see advantages in A4 if Quanta is serious about
electronic publishing. If it is serious, then there is no choice. We
have to go A4. However Quanta must still do its homework.
A5 please.
Can't really see why something as archaic as paper size affects
electronic
I would like the magazine kept the way it is now.
Not sure about downloadable version,. this would mean non-subscribers
would have access to the magazine.
But I guess this has been thought out.
Derek
Stephen wrote:
In summary I can only see advantages in A4 if Quanta is serious about
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 at 22:28:58, Stephen wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In summary I can only see advantages in A4 if Quanta is serious about
electronic publishing. If it is serious, then there is no choice. We
have to go A4. However Quanta must still do its homework.
A5 please.
Can't
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 at 22:38:14, Derek Stewart wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I would like the magazine kept the way it is now.
Not sure about downloadable version,. this would mean non-subscribers
would have access to the magazine.
But I guess this has been thought out.
With my home based
