[Ql-Users] Graphics aspect ratio

I'm sorry if this question has been answered before, but I've run into an issue with SMSQ/E's graphics system. When you use the CIRCLE command on a window with an aspect ratio of, say, 3:2 (on the screen, not in pixels since the graphics coordinate system is pixel-independent!) and type: CIRCLE 75

Re: [Ql-Users] Graphics aspect ratio

Jan, SMSQ/E uses the variable pt_asprt equ$14a ; 6 bytes float pixel aspect ratio in the extended channel definition block for exactly that purpose. You can poke this address in order to change the pixel aspect ratio. Tobias > Am 28.04.2017 um 13:52 schrieb Jan Bredenbeek : > > I'm s

Re: [Ql-Users] Graphics aspect ratio

Try this: (from Bob Spelten Jr. homepage) G-RATIO. Jens Wildgruber made a small extension which corrects the original QL graphics commands. Strange circles in other resolutions than the old 512x256? Not any longer with G-RATIO. Click here to

Re: [Ql-Users] Graphics aspect ratio

Thanks for the answers! The variable pt_asprt is actually in the CON device linkage block which is pointed to by the sys_clnk system variable (I couldn't find it in the QDOS/SMS Reference Manual, only in the SMSQ/E source code. Jan. -- *Jan Bredenbeek* | Hilversum, NL | j...@bredenbeek.net _

Re: [Ql-Users] Graphics aspect ratio

Right. Somewhere there ;) I seem to recall I saw that variable referenced somewhere in the "official" documents - But when I looked for it, I couldn't find it either and had to refer to the sources as well. Tobias > Am 28.04.2017 um 15:25 schrieb Jan Bredenbeek : > > Thanks for the answers! T

Re: [Ql-Users] Graphics aspect ratio

On 28 Apr 2017 at 15:30, Tobias Fröschle wrote: > I seem to recall I saw that variable referenced somewhere in the > "official" documents Funny, I was looking for that yesterday also. While the Q68 previously had only QL modes and upscaled modes with same ratio, I recently added 1024x768 and 51

Re: [Ql-Users] Graphics aspect ratio

> Am 28.04.2017 um 15:30 schrieb Tobias Fröschle : > > Right. Somewhere there ;) > > I seem to recall I saw that variable referenced somewhere in the "official" > documents - But when I looked for it, I couldn't find it either and had to > refer to the sources as well I added that feature at t