Re: Large message killing system

1999-11-16 Thread Florian G. Pflug
On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 11:35:06AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 08:35:18PM +, Florian G. Pflug wrote: Well, 10MB Message for 15 Users makes 150MB vs. 16MB Ram + 50 MB Swap makes 64MB. So if qmail tried to deliver all the messages simultaniously, it will run into

Re: Large message killing system

1999-11-14 Thread Florian G. Pflug
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 07:21:58AM -0600, Matthew Callaway wrote: Dave Sill wrote: It's obvious that 150 MB of mail is a lot to process on such a pokey little machine, but it seems a bit odd for the machine to completely choke and die. If you push an underpowered system running

Re: Large message killing system

1999-11-14 Thread nascheme
On Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 08:35:18PM +, Florian G. Pflug wrote: Under any good OS (not Win95, Winnt?), software running in userspace (that is, all programms, including init) should _never_ be able to crash the machine. If the machine crashed under heavy load and/or heavy IO, it seems that

Re: Large message killing system

1999-11-14 Thread Jason Haar
On Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 08:35:18PM +, Florian G. Pflug wrote: Well, 10MB Message for 15 Users makes 150MB vs. 16MB Ram + 50 MB Swap makes 64MB. So if qmail tried to deliver all the messages simultaniously, it will run into trouble, and could make the machine *seem* to be crashed, while it

Re: Large message killing system

1999-11-12 Thread Matthew Callaway
Dave Sill wrote: It's obvious that 150 MB of mail is a lot to process on such a pokey little machine, but it seems a bit odd for the machine to completely choke and die. If you push an underpowered system running antiquated software to the breaking point, don't be surprised if it breaks.

Re: Large message killing system

1999-11-12 Thread Dave Sill
Matthew Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I realize that the machine is old, and is running software that has updates, but the point is that a heavily loaded mail program shouldn't *kill* a machine. When you say "kill", do you mean the system actually crashes, or just slows to a crawl? If it

Re: Large message killing system

1999-11-11 Thread Matthew Callaway
Earlier I wrote: Mail seems to be successfully delivered, but then processes grind to a halt, and the machine actually crashes. Upon rebooting, the machine dies again during the boot process, and rebooting a third time it died at the login prompt. Only after the fourth reboot does it seem

Re: Large message killing system

1999-11-11 Thread Dave Sill
Matthew Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: qmail-1.01 (yes we know it's not the newest, but that shouldn't relate to the problem at hand) Red Hat Linux 4.2 (kernel 2.0.35) running on a pentium 133 with 16 MB of RAM Diskspace is plentiful. It's obvious that 150 MB of mail is a lot to process on