Michael T. Babcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've written a filter in Python that scans for Received: lines and
checks IP addresses found therein against a configurable list of
RBL type services. It is in beta stages and definately under
development, but it is very functional (doesn't crash
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 02:02:23AM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
I've written a filter in Python that scans for Received: lines and
checks IP addresses found therein against a configurable list of
RBL type services. It is in beta stages and definately under
development, but it is very
http://www.fibrespeed.net/code/spamcheck.tar.gz
404
Thanks ...
http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/code/spamcheck.tar.gz
--
Michael T. Babcock
CTO, FibreSpeed
"Andrew Wafula" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I was at the ORBS site the other day and I saw that as from 1st Feb 2001
relays.orbs.org would be deleted.
This may seem dumb but here goes :).
Now, does it mean that we can no longer use it to check for open
relays
No, they just
On 9 Feb 2001, Scott Gifford wrote:
No, they just split it up, to make it easier to pick and choose the
parts of ORBS that you want to use.
Also I must add to my blacklist the new ORBS addresses to avoid
to scan smtp of my servers
Thanks for info
Piotr
---
Piotr Kasztelowicz
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 08:47:06AM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
Hello
This may seem dumb but here goes :).
Now, does it mean that we can no longer use it to check for open relays and
if so what replacement do we have?
I had said about the mor free time!!!
But is this really
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 12:55:07PM +0100, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
On 9 Feb 2001, Scott Gifford wrote:
No, they just split it up, to make it easier to pick and choose the
parts of ORBS that you want to use.
Also I must add to my blacklist the new ORBS addresses to avoid
to scan smtp
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, asantos wrote:
I think this is interesting for this list:
http://slashdot.org/yro/00/12/13/1853237.shtml
That's a mail policy issue, not a mail server issue. Consider taking
RBL-related issues to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's certainly on-topic for that list. It'll
msci.memphis.edu
This should be relays.msci.memphis.edu.
How did you enter these domains?
Why did you enter both
dul.maps.vix.com
and
dialups.mail-abuse.org
What is the difference?
Mate
I think I entered the names that I got off of the anti-spam doc on qmail.org.
I could have messed up also, thanks for the corrections.
At 11:32 AM 11/20/00 -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
msci.memphis.edu
This should be relays.msci.memphis.edu.
How did you enter these domains?
Why did you enter
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Jon Rust wrote:
Just got a call from an angry MSN user.
http://www.internetnews.com/isp-news/article/0,,8_512791,00.html
jon
It's too bad that companies can't set up two systems... one for people
who don't want to receive this spam crap and one for customers who lack
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 06:58:30PM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
It's too bad that companies can't set up two systems... one for people
who don't want to receive this spam crap and one for customers who lack
clue.
As well as us who actually want to collect spam (for research and
investigation
Message-
From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 8:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RBL
Mike Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First I did this setup and it did not work .
tcpserver -p -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u1007 -g1007 0 25 \
rblsmtpd qmail-smtpd 21
Mike Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First I did this setup and it did not work .
tcpserver -p -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u1007 -g1007 0 25 \
rblsmtpd qmail-smtpd 21 | setuser qmaill accustamp | \
setuser qmaill cyclog \
-s100 -n5 /var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd
[root@black(/var/log)]: smstart
[x]
Believe me, I've been very tempted to blackhole .jp, .kr and don't forget
.co.uk or .it but then I realized, for the most port the spam originates
from the U.S. and uses an open relay in these countries to spam.
I think the long term goal is to educate the admins of these foreign
domains. A good
* Michael T Babcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone have a program that does the checks rblsmtpd does, except
that it allows the modification of the message header instead of
blocking the mail?
Procmail, preferably in conjunction with rblcheck:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30 Aug 2000, at 8:24, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
Am i to understand that rblsmtpd's devlopment has ceased? I think
DJB's page says some mention of that, and also instructs that the
functionality has been introduced into tcpserver now.
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Petr Novotny wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| On 30 Aug 2000, at 8:24, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
|
| Am i to understand that rblsmtpd's devlopment has ceased? I think
| DJB's page says some mention of that, and also instructs that the
You misunderstood the statement. rblsmtpd is now part of the ucspi-tcp
package. See: http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
Am i to understand that rblsmtpd's devlopment has ceased? I think DJB's
page says some mention of that, and also
Tonino,
The RBL uses DNS, so if your DNS server is local then it is caching copies
of the RBL list locally.
Henry
TAG wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way of keeping a local copy of the RBL lists and using those
instead of trying to get it from the remote site - should this not speed
things up - I
Henry Baragar wrote:
Tonino,
The RBL uses DNS, so if your DNS server is local then it is caching copies
of the RBL list locally.
Henry
TAG wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way of keeping a local copy of the RBL lists and using those
instead of trying to get it from the remote site -
Tonino,
I think I spoke too soon (only on my first cup of coffee)... Specific entries
will have been cached if they have been seen before, but not necessarily the
whole list. However, you can use DNS to get the complete list: see
http://maps.vix.com/rbl/usage.html.
Henry
Henry Baragar
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:04:59PM +0200,
TAG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way of keeping a local copy of the RBL lists and using those
instead of trying to get it from the remote site - should this not speed
things up - I also know that the list is updated all the time - but can
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 08:49:48AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
! There are ways to get complete copies of some other RBL styled lists.
Indeed. DJB himself said as much on the dns list:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?m=95836494819286
---Chris K.
--
Chris, the Young One |_ but what's a
No, RBL onlt requires that you do that if you want certian levels of
filtering (namely DNS).
uscpi-tcp-88 has RBL built in.. www.qmail.org
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 10:44:49AM -0400,
Paul Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, RBL onlt requires that you do that if you want certian levels of
filtering (namely DNS).
uscpi-tcp-88 has RBL built in.. www.qmail.org
But this program does a remote lookup each time. The original question
The part I was zeroing in on was that you needed to sign a waiver to use
the RBL. That is incorrect. You need to sign a waiver if you get the
zone file via DNS zone transfers.
I'm using RBL now and didn't sign a thing but I don't use the zone
file.
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL
If you use a caching nameserver, frequent domains will automatically be
cached for a given amount of time. If you read the entire website for the
RBL (or other related lists) you'll find that they have subscription options
... basically you'd set yourself up as a slave server that downloads the
Noah Sutherland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 11 November 1999 at 14:43:25 -0800
I am trying to set up the RBL for the first time. It just is *not*
working. OK, first, here is the recommended startup line from the web
site:
tcpserver 0 25 tcpcontrol /etc/smtp.cdb /usr/local/bin/smtplog
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
What method of RBL are you trying to use? The standard qmail method
requires running rblsmtpd, which I don't see you doing. There were
some old patches to integrate the functionality into qmail; were you
using those instead?
I was trying the
Hi Doug,
What is the *best* means to use the RBL, DUL, Shubs, and others, with
qmail-smtpd and be able to allow our dialups to relay?
tcpserver/tcprules will take care of the selective relaying, and rblsmtpd
(available from ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/pub/software/) will handle RBL
for you
hey all, here is a quickie little program i wrote to see exactly what
rblsmtp is doing for you, here is an example of the output:
#!/bin/sh
echo "RBL-Stats v1.0 by xs [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
echo ""
echo "checking your logfile, this'll take a few."
cat $1|grep rblsmtp ~/.rbltmp.bak
echo
Hi,
it looks like you have a very special Unix tho (:
the scriptie worked fine for me.
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 12:48:25AM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
Has anyone managed to get this to run?
My /bin/sh doesn't do ~ expansion
and the awk line appears tohave syntax errors with either the "
or
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 07:55:05PM -0500, xs wrote:
as anyone had the pleasure of dealing with some of the (excuse the
language) ass pirates that refuse to fix their MTA(s) or work to get their
sites taken out of the ORBS, RBL, DSSL, or DUL databases?
We haven't had these types of
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 12:48:25AM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
blocked."
echo "Great Hunt."
rm ~/.rbltmp.bak
#EOF
Has anyone managed to get this to run?
My /bin/sh doesn't do ~ expansion
and the awk line appears tohave syntax errors with either the "
or the ` or both.
Pavel V. Piankov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 24 March 1999 at 14:43:47 +0300
Hi,
it looks like you have a very special Unix tho (:
the scriptie worked fine for me.
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 12:48:25AM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
Has anyone managed to get this to run?
My
anyway, thats what the BS in ORBS stands for, Behavor
modification System.
I had an experience like this. I moved my email activity over to my
own LAN, using qmail, from my newly upgraded account with a "real" ISP,
using sendmail and fetchmail to do the ISP-related activity (via PPP
dial-up on
Joel Eriksson wrote:
Have you ever heard about symlink-in-tmp problems?.. That is a classic mistake.
Erm, I haven't. Where would I read about such things, and other
"classic" mistakes?
R.
--
Two rules to success in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
-- Sassan Tat
38 matches
Mail list logo
