Re: [qmailadmin] Finally Posted - New Look, Feel, and Navigation for Qmailadmin

2003-07-15 Thread Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET
Hello all, This kind of interface is very proffessionnal and seem to been more easy to understand for end user. Thanks for your job Justin . Regarding the point that Tom mentionned, i also aggred with him. Maybe it is possible to change this using some library to generate on the fly good

Re: [qmailadmin] Finally Posted - New Look, Feel, and Navigation for Qmailadmin

2003-07-15 Thread Alan Murrell
Hi Justin, The look you came up with is great! Your instructions involve replacing some standard qmailadmin files with the ones in your package. My question is: would this still allow any qmailadmin patches to work? That is, assuming that what there has been patches for in the past for adding

Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin

2003-07-15 Thread Alan Murrell
Hi Chris, --- Chris Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have fixed my SpamAssassin problem. I had to do some reading to figure it out. What was the solution? It may help someone else out in the future... Also is there a reason that mail only sent to the real user is processed. My

Re: [qmailadmin] aliases to bitbucket

2003-07-15 Thread Tom Collins
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 01:38 AM, Jim wrote: qmailadmin does not recognize addresses with only a # in them -- it completely ignores them. qmailadmin also does not deal with .qmail-files with the vdelivermail '' delete string correctly... it shows them as: bitbucket

RE: [qmailadmin] Finally Posted - New Look, Feel, and Navigation for Qmailadmin

2003-07-15 Thread Justin Couto
Alan, I am 99.9% sure all patches should still work. All the files we edited were just changed for visual appeal. We didn't change or remove any functionality. So future patches should work for you unless something is added into one of the html templates that currently isn't in ours. If this

Fw: [qmailadmin] aliases to bitbucket

2003-07-15 Thread Jeremy Kister
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:07 PM, Tom Collins wrote: Please note! vdelivermail should NEVER be used in .qmail-user files -- it should only appear in the .qmail-default file. I'm not arguing here, just expressing my ignorance... Why? I currently use things like |/usr/local/bin/spamc |

Re: Fw: [qmailadmin] aliases to bitbucket

2003-07-15 Thread Tom Collins
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 10:02 AM, Jeremy Kister wrote: On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:07 PM, Tom Collins wrote: Please note! vdelivermail should NEVER be used in .qmail-user files -- it should only appear in the .qmail-default file. I'm not arguing here, just expressing my ignorance...

[qmailadmin] RE: [mail-toaster] Finally Posted - New Look, Feel, and Navigation for Qmailadmin

2003-07-15 Thread Justin Couto
This login file has been fixed. You can re-download the sources for the changes. Thanks for the info! Justin C. -Original Message- From: Andryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [mail-toaster] Finally Posted - New Look,

[qmailadmin] Seamless Integration - Finally Posted - New Look, Feel, and Navigation for Qmailadmin

2003-07-15 Thread Justin Couto
Hello Everyone, I am writing in response to someone that asked how we seamlessly integrated squirrelmail and qmailadmin using iframes and so a user doesn't have to login to each application after initially logging in. This was a pretty simple task using PHP. Instruction: First we created our

[qmailadmin] unable to login

2003-07-15 Thread Sasha
Hello, I just compiled 1.0.23 of qmailadmin. installed using same options in configure as I used to build 1.0.15. I compiled, installed (as root). All attributes are correct (ie vpopmail:vchkpw) and start getting invalid login error message. I recompiled 1.0.15 - everything

Re: [qmailadmin] unable to login

2003-07-15 Thread Tom Collins
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 04:27 PM, Sasha wrote: I just compiled 1.0.23 of qmailadmin. installed using same options in configure as I used to build 1.0.15. I compiled, installed (as root). All attributes are correct (ie vpopmail:vchkpw) and start getting invalid login error

[qmailadmin] Fw: [vchkpw] Re: Fw: [qmailadmin] aliases to bitbucket

2003-07-15 Thread Jeremy Kister
..On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 1:16 PM, Tom Collins wrote: Many people (myself included) thought it would just accept the mail and do whatever you requested as the last parameter (bounce-no-mailbox, deleted, directory for delivery, etc.). same here. ..and continued: qmail-local looks for

Fw: [qmailadmin] Finally Posted - New Look, Feel, and Navigation for Qmailadmin

2003-07-15 Thread Jeremy Kister
On Monday, July 14, 2003 8:56 PM, Justin Couto wrote: I hope this helps some of you and we really hope it gets adopted as the new qmailadmin interface. Please give us feedback in the mailing list and if you would like to see these changes in future releases of qmail admin please show