Jake Vickers wrote:
Naveen wrote:
Hi List,
Is there any way to export the present email address details in csv
format to Qmail toaster?
Right now I am running Alt N MDaemon , from this I can export all
users details for all domain in to CSV format.
I would like to know is there
PakOgah wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Naveen wrote:
Hi List,
Is there any way to export the present email address details in csv
format to Qmail toaster?
Right now I am running Alt N MDaemon , from this I can export all
users details for all domain in to CSV format.
I would like to
I have a user with a Blackberry problem. They can send email to anyone
except there own domain from there blackberry. Outlook and webmail
works just fine.
delivery status
div class=moz-text-flowed style=font-family:
-moz-fixedFinal-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] (this is fake
This is what the bounce email shows.
The following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry, sender address has invalid
format (#5.7.1 - chkuser)'
Jeremy Towne wrote:
I have a user with a Blackberry problem. They can
Yes the problem is the chkuser sender check.
You need to add SENDER_NOCHECK=1 to your tcprules file, for either the
mailservers from blackberry or for your default rule.
JP
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Towne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent:
Dear Everyone,
How to disable ezmlm probe?
Isn't there anybody who knows this?
I mean I want to block ezmlm warning message...
Bilgehan POYRAZ
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
So I want to add
na.blackberry.com:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1
Jeremy
Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
Yes the problem is the chkuser sender check.
You need to add SENDER_NOCHECK=1 to your tcprules file, for either
the mailservers from blackberry or for your default rule.
JP
-
I just realize when I try sending email from YahooMail-beta (new
interface), the email didn't get into my toaster.
but when I switch back to YahooMail-classic interface, it's delivered to
my mailbox.
is it just my toaster ? or do you have the same problem?
try sending from yahoomail using:
PakOgah wrote:
I just realize when I try sending email from YahooMail-beta (new
interface), the email didn't get into my toaster.
but when I switch back to YahooMail-classic interface, it's delivered
to my mailbox.
is it just my toaster ? or do you have the same problem?
try sending from
2007/8/8, PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PakOgah wrote:
I just realize when I try sending email from YahooMail-beta (new
interface), the email didn't get into my toaster.
but when I switch back to YahooMail-classic interface, it's delivered
to my mailbox.
is it just my toaster ? or do
just added the bold line into /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run
exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 3000 \
/usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp \
/usr/bin/recordio \
$RBLSMTPD $BLACKLIST $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/true
2007/8/8, PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
just added the bold line into /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run
exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 3000 \
/usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c $MAXSMTPD
\
-u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp \
/usr/bin/recordio \
A M wrote:
2007/8/8, PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
just added the bold line into /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run
exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 3000 \
/usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c
$MAXSMTPD \
-u
You are so correct
it got your name on qmail-toaster.spec
beside big-dns patch this will be another reason to upgrade to latest
release.
I think this case can be closed
Thank you AM, JP
* Sat Apr 14 2007 Nick Hemmesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.03-1.3.15
- Add CentOS 5 i386 support
- Add CentOS 5
The latest version is allready patched to accept bare linefeeds..
JP
- Original Message -
From: PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] rcvd from YahooMail-beta problem (is it just me
?)
I once stumbled upon a .qmail file someone had made that would strip out the
header(s) used for read/return receipts. I think the
only one that really needs stripped is Disposition-Notification-To though.
I find these to be very annoying myself and can't find the .qmail file anymore.
Would
PakOgah wrote:
Extract from Securityfocus...
Hi,
The @Mail dev team have created a module for spamassassin which uses the
sa engine to scan the content of PDF attachments and append the spam score
to the score of the email message -- and it WORKS!
http://blog.atmail.com/?p=61
I'm seeing some mail come through my qmailtoasters that do not get the
X-Spam-Status header.
Most messages seem to be processed properly but some are not.
All messages are getting a header like this:
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 11009, pid: 11010, t: 1.3068s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1
Actually, I think I answered my own question.
|formail -I Disposition-Notification-To: -I
Registered-Mail-Reply-Requested-By: -I Return-Receipt-To: -I
X-Receipt-Request-Deleted: |/var/qmail/bin/preline /usr/bin/maildrop -A
'Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster' /etc/mail/mailfilter
Eric Webster
However I left the request for read receipts from my testing on when I sent
this reply to the list. Sorry about that everyone.
Eric Webster
Enterprise Services
2CheckOut.com
-Original Message-
From: Eric Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 1:10 PM
To:
I'm having the same problem with blackberry users in my domain.
I've traced the problem down to a forward slash character ('/') in the
SRS-ified To: header in messages coming from blackberry users to users
in my domain. Chkuser doesn't like this.
I was about to go through the process listed
I look into qmail-toaster files ant it looks like there is no any ipv6 patch
for qmail inside.
So is there any plans to add patch for ipv6 into 1.3 branch (at least for
testing purposes for future) or we can see this only in upcoming 1.4 branch?
I had problems before with emails coming from ticketmaster.co.uk and some
other domains.
The chkuser settings are a bit outdated since lots of domains use strange
characters that ckuser dislikes.
And they are allowed per rfc (if i remember correctly).
Thats why I disabled the sender format
Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on
devel site under heavy load?
I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav
0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all
viruses that freshclam
I have no issues. I process approx 30K messages a day on some of my boxes.
The new spamassassin requires many more perl modules to be complete.
Best bet is to either use rpmforge repo and install the perl modules
via rpm OR to cpan install them.
Without the packages, the load is higher with the
ok, looks like better choose spamd 3.1 branch for me.
If i think correctly on this new machine amount of messages can be hier upto
two times (~60-70K) (much more virtual domains).
Are you using clamav 0.91.1 without any changes in configs that comes with
src.rpm (disable ole\pdf scan or
Greetings,
Are you using clamav 0.91.1 without any changes in configs that comes with
src.rpm (disable ole\pdf scan or enabling experimental code)?
I am running ClamAV exactly as it is on the dev site.
And is there any plans for moving it on main site (and squirrel webmail too
:) )?
I
L. A. wrote:
Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on
devel site under heavy load?
I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav
0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all
viruses that
Hey all,
Got a small issue. I have addresses that check email from remote networks
and then I have a few ips that get blacklisted from time to time for
whatever the reason. I hate SORBS. Anyways I have them set their outgoing
port to 587 and they can telnet to that port but the server still
smtp auth turned on in the client software? i just switched some users to
submission port and it is working great...
_
From: Kyle Quillen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 1:10 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Submission port
Of perl modules that need installed?
I pulled this from an email back on the 7th of January
I don't think I have the time or energy to handle rpm's for every perl
module used by SpamAssassin for every distribution we support.
For those that can, use RPMForge, for those distros not covered
I have tried to find the area in the logs and can't seem to.
I am going to try and replicate and then it will hopefully be in there for
that user and email.
Thanks
Q
-Original Message-
From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 6:03 PM
To:
The logs should be in /var/log/qmail/submission/current, unless you
set up your own port 587. If you created your own you may have carried
over a few things like rblsmtpd that shouldn't be there.
Erik
On 8/8/07, Kyle Quillen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried to find the area in the logs and
One more tip:
Make sure your reverse DNS for your new server is set up. Comcast and
AOL reject mail that does not have reverse DNS set up correctly. See
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dnsnr.html
George Toft, CISSP, MSIS
623-203-1760
Naveen wrote:
Dear list,
Presently my
Please provide more information.
George Toft, CISSP, MSIS
623-203-1760
Harry Zink wrote:
Install BlockHosts - it takes care of these kind of hack attempts really
fast.
Harry
On Aug 7, 2007, at 6:04 PM, George Toft wrote:
If you offer POP service to the Internet, this is going to
I checked out that before and there we no errors. Of course I requested
that the ip be taken off of the blacklist it was on.
I ran the command
Cat | grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] current
It pulled all of that user logs but there were no errors So I am not sure
what happened.
The submission port
Yes please do provide more info.
Thanks
Q
-Original Message-
From: George Toft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 8:00 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Unwanted Login Attempts
Please provide more information.
George Toft,
Found this...
http://www.aczoom.com/cms/faq/blockhosts#q_293
On 8/8/07, Kyle Quillen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes please do provide more info.
Thanks
Q
-Original Message-
From: George Toft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 8:00 PM
To:
All true. You can subscribe to the spamdyke mailing list here:
http://spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
-- Sam Clippinger
Joseph Lundgren wrote:
Yup.
I’m using it solely for the logging capabilities that it adds, so I
can’t really commentate authoritatively on its
Hey all,
What are some suggestions for a post install script that could be ran to
further harden a toaster system?
This is something that I think I can contribute if you guys give me a list
of things you think you would like to see the script install/setup.
Or is it good the way it is
40 matches
Mail list logo
