But I guess there is no way to import automatically an user list from
the old server to the new server and use a script to create these user
accounts?
Peter
On Dec 30, 2007 10:55 PM, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like you have to import users first before doing the rsync to
HELp PLEASE
Uupppss,, I have followed this guide, and now I am more netqmail
boots, start by putting qmailctl tells me that lack clamav
2008/1/1, Todd W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Ariel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have tried to install clamav-toaster-0.92 and build the package
give me an error
I returned to this page to compile
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=670
And do not understand that
2008/1/1, Todd W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Ariel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have tried to install clamav-toaster-0.92 and build the package
give me an error
Here are the commands
Problem solved ...
I have done an in-yum update and at the end I was able to compile
without problems package clamav-toaster
2008/1/2, Ariel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I returned to this page to compile
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=670
And do not understand that
2008/1/1,
From: Alberto Guzzetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Todd W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here are the commands I used:
cd /usr/src/qtms-install/
wget
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/download/develop/clamav-toaster-0.92-1.3.16.src.rpm
rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt40 clamav-toaster-0.92-1.3.16.src.rpm
qmailctl
buenos días para toda la lista, tengo una serie de dudas y no veo como
resolverlas, necesito crear un filtro de mail, he intentado con scripts
de bash y no meda, he intentado con un script en php pero se me ha
dificultado mesclarlo con qmail, con bash ejecuto la siguiente guuion
que pienso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Todd W wrote:
Here are the commands I used:
cd /usr/src/qtms-install/
wget
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/download/develop/clamav-toaster-0.92-1.3.16.src.rpm
rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt40 clamav-toaster-0.92-1.3.16.src.rpm
qmailctl stop
QMT-ISO 1.4.0 has been released and is now ready for download. It's
available at http://qmtiso.com
Here's the latest changelog:
version 1.4.0 - 01/01/2008
Updated all packages to CentOS 4.6
Added 'iftop' utility - it's what top is for CPUs, only
for network interfaces
Seeing you updating packages to CentOS brings up a question I've been wondering
about...
I'm running QMT on Fedora 6 and everything is fine. I know the install
instructions/scripts are essentially the same for Fed6 and CentOS. Since I'm
pretty new to the linux world, what is the difference
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
Seeing you updating packages to CentOS brings up a question I've been wondering
about...
I'm running QMT on Fedora 6 and everything is fine. I know the install instructions/scripts are essentially the same for Fed6 and CentOS. Since I'm pretty new to the linux world,
Since I installed using 1.3.1, is there an upgrade path? It would be cool to
pop the CD in and have an upgrade option. I'm guessing that would be very
complicated so it's just a wish :).
Mike
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:37:05 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
QMT-ISO 1.4.0 has been released and is now
Thanks Jake,
That covers it exactly. The FC6 I have is no different than what CentOS will
be in a version or 2 and there is no compelling reason to move over to it.
I thought it might be something like that but you just filled in the gaps.
Thanks,
Phil
-Original message-
From: Jake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I installed using 1.3.1, is there an upgrade path? It would be cool to
pop the CD in and have an upgrade option. I'm guessing that would be very
complicated so it's just a wish :).
It's something I'm thinking about doing, but due to the amount of work
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
Thanks Jake,
That covers it exactly. The FC6 I have is no different than what CentOS will
be in a version or 2 and there is no compelling reason to move over to it.
I thought it might be something like that but you just filled in the gaps.
No problem. There are
It's something I'm thinking about doing, but due to the amount of work
involved would probably not be in the freebie bin (ie: a subscription
I think folks understand that and would be willing to pay a reasonable fee.
Right now suggestions are best. I do not get many any more (even
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, how about a version which has spf and domainkeys fully activated with
email making it to yahoo and hotmail right out of the box? :). I've had
countless people help me with this, have yet to figure it out, weird eh?
I may take a crack at that; I've set up
I may take a crack at that; I've set up several machines recently and
have not had any issue sending to Yahoo or Hotmail (even though I'm not
using DK), so it may be an outside factor.
I've wondered about that also and took a close look at my watchguard firewall
thinking it might be that. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may take a crack at that; I've set up several machines recently and
have not had any issue sending to Yahoo or Hotmail (even though I'm not
using DK), so it may be an outside factor.
I've wondered about that also and took a close look at my watchguard firewall
Yea Mike, I'm not sure why Yahoo and Hotmail don't like you. That is really
strange. I have 2 different post offices I run, one is the QMT and the other
is Merak. They both aren't having any problems sending to Yahoo or Hotmail.
It's not to say I never had any problems though. Those and
I don't have spf and dk on all toasters and at start yahoo would set it
as bulk mail and hotmail would not show the mails, after sending a mail
from hotmail to the new domain and make a reply to that mail, the mails
started to appear
First, was that just for one account on both sites or did
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have spf and dk on all toasters and at start yahoo would set it
as bulk mail and hotmail would not show the mails, after sending a mail
from hotmail to the new domain and make a reply to that mail, the mails
started to appear
First, was that just for one
I think scripts to do this sort of thing have been posted to the list in the
past. Check the archives.
Peter Peltonen wrote:
But I guess there is no way to import automatically an user list from
the old server to the new server and use a script to create these user
accounts?
Peter
On Dec
WOW cool! A faster sandbox would be great. I like your note about go get a
cup of coffee when I run yours now. I have to laugh every time I see it. It
runs more like go eat dinner on mine.
That's in no way a shot at you at all Jake. I may not understand Linux all
that well but I do
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
WOW cool! A faster sandbox would be great. I like your note about go get a cup of coffee when I run yours now. I have to laugh every time I see it. It runs more like go eat dinner on mine.
That's in no way a shot at you at all Jake. I may not understand Linux all
That's the fun part about all of this. You have to throw some humor in to
breakup the dryness. I try to name customer's machines with some
imagination rather than just FS1. I've used Disney, Bugs Bunny, all kinds
of names. Some people just take it too seriously. Of course, I've been in
it
Yea Mike, I'm not sure why Yahoo and Hotmail don't like you. That is
really strange. I have 2 different post offices I run, one is the QMT and
Something with the firewall then as we've been mulling around. I don't see
much else and it's one of those things where you look at it too long,
building everything on a P3-500Mhz and a P3-700Mhz that I have to share
256M of RAM between. Even my desktop is out in the living room right
now acting as a MythTV box until I fix my other one so I can't even run
VMWare.
Jake,
Some of my work includes clustered computers so I have all of
I have this exact same problem and am yet to figure out what it is.
some times it goes to the bulk mail folder sometimes it just gets
deferred back to me and i am no idea what it would be.
Q
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 20:58 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea Mike, I'm not sure why Yahoo and
Tim on this list figured out what was wrong with my DK problems along with
some DNS issues and everything seems to be resolved. The testing from other
sites seems to show that all is fine but it's not. As you've seen, other
others on the list have also helped me out. This seems to be something
29 matches
Mail list logo
