Sam Clippinger wrote:
A few developments on the spamdyke front:
I've added a spamdyke page to the QT wiki, though it doesn't currently
have anything but a link to the spamdyke site. For now, I'd
appreciate it if people would edit the page to add comments about the
type of content they'd
Alexandre Shima ha scritto:
Hello,
I'm having problems with the black list file size.
My file is really big, 240k+ IP entries, and SpamDyke 2.3.1 cannot
handle it.
I'll upgrade to the new version and check if there is a difference.
Thank you.
Alexandre
Wow -- that's amazing. Is it possible to reduce the size by specifying
IP ranges instead of individual IPs? It might also be more efficient to
run a (private) DNS RBL server instead of using a file-based solution.
-- Sam Clippinger
Alexandre Shima wrote:
Hello,
I'm having problems with
Hello,
I'm having problems with the black list file size.
My file is really big, 240k+ IP entries, and SpamDyke 2.3.1 cannot handle it.
I'll upgrade to the new version and check if there is a difference.
Thank you.
Alexandre
I don't use any blog/CMS software -- just vi. It's enough for now.
Apples to apples, for general purposes, compiled languages (C/C++) are
faster than scripted languages (perl/python). However, apples to apples
comparisons are almost nearly impossible. For example, perl has many
optimized
have the
servers and the disk space and the bandwidth. Feel free to e-mail me off
list if you want to discuss.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 8:49 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] my battle
Oh GREAT we have spamdyke developer in our list...
Just like Erik said you can create wiki on qmailtoaster wiki
and for milist if the fastest way create [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so beat it...
oh dont forget to archive it on mail-archive.com
thx
Sam Clippinger wrote:
Great! Thanks for the offers --
That is a valid concern, though I try to respond to every spamdyke email
I get.
There's no wiki, mailing list, forum, blog at this point only because no
one has set one up -- spamdyke is just too new. I'd be happy to
participate in any of those things but I just don't have the time to
Sam Clippinger wrotes
to every spamdyke email I get.
There's no wiki, mailing list, forum, blog at this point only because
no one has set one up -- spamdyke is just too new. I'd be happy to
participate in any of those things but I just don't have the time to
administer them. If anyone
Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 8:49 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] my battle against spam
That is a valid concern, though I try to respond to every spamdyke email I
get.
There's no wiki, mailing list, forum, blog at this point
, 2007 8:49 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] my battle against spam
That is a valid concern, though I try to respond to every spamdyke email I
get.
There's no wiki, mailing list, forum, blog at this point only because no one
has set one up -- spamdyke is just
me off
list if you want to discuss.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 8:49 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] my battle against spam
That is a valid concern, though I try to respond to every
If spamdyke fixes qmail's dubious logging, I think it's worth rolling
into the toaster immediately! :)
Yup it sure look good and have a lot of nice features but when I check the
website there aren't any type of support like forum, milist or wiki?
only the coder email address, I am not sure if
There is a high probability that spamdyke will be in the 1.4 branch of
the QmailToaster.
Erik
On 6/17/07, PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If spamdyke fixes qmail's dubious logging, I think it's worth rolling
into the toaster immediately! :)
Yup it sure look good and have a lot of nice
, 2007 4:09 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] my battle against spam
Regarding question 2, blacklisting a specific From address is usually
a waste of time because most spammers use a different fake From
address for each spam message. However, if they're not doing
Friends,
In my ongoing battle againt spam - I have a few questions.
I already do some Bayesian Statistical Scoring with a spam notspam accounts
As described in http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SpamAssassin
and I am rather certain this is working - based on the repeat offenders that
seem
Regarding question 2, blacklisting a specific From address is usually
a waste of time because most spammers use a different fake From
address for each spam message. However, if they're not doing that to
you, great! Block it!
May I humbly recommend spamdyke?
17 matches
Mail list logo
