Hi Martin,
maybe Simon did an own binding without using the default bindings, in
this case no model is bound.
@Simon
Simon, did you use a own bindItem? Do you also bind the model to the item?
Cheers,
Chris
Am 15.12.2011 08:05, schrieb Martin Wittemann:
Hey,
If I change your code to:
Hi,
Ok, it was my mobile connection. Sorry for that.
This part of the manual is really confusing (even I don't get it). I think we
should clarify that. I will forward your mail to Martin.
Best regards,
Tino
Am 09.12.2011 um 19:40 schrieb Simon White:
Hi
Why does the QooxDoo manual in the
Hi Scott,
self() is a helper function provided by qooxdoo (qx.core.Object#self) to make
JavaScript with its prototype based inheritance appear more classical. base()
is another example of those helpers, providing a way to call overridden methods
(super in some other languages).
Back to
Am 14.12.2011 21:44, schrieb Dietrich Streifert:
Am 14.12.2011 17:44, schrieb thron7:
Thanks, Dietrich, for digging into this so well. Could you open a bug
for it and attach your findings?! That would be great.
Thanks,
T.
Done:
http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5951
Please
How do you manage the *.js file loading in your app.js?
Titanium.include('view/Translation.js');
that is static and Titanium handles the code inside the package.
We have looked at dynamic as well but not tested enough to say anything clearly
about it.
Have you intercepted the titanium build
Btw: what runtime do you use in android? Is it Rhino or V8?
Android v 2.2 and concomitant js
Stefan
--
10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation
Server virtualization is being
Extending Object is still regarded as a sin of the general js community. This
opinion can be bypassed by an access pointer instead of inheritance.
Stefan
--
10 Tips for Better
Very nice, Dietrich, you're stirring it all up :).
T.
On 12/15/2011 10:32 AM, Dietrich Streifert wrote:
Am 14.12.2011 21:44, schrieb Dietrich Streifert:
Am 14.12.2011 17:44, schrieb thron7:
Thanks, Dietrich, for digging into this so well. Could you open a bug
for it and attach your
little question: (sorry the english)
Why VirtualSelectBox, from qx.ui.form namespace, don't have any interface
for work with qx.ui.form.Form together.
This is a temporal situation or not
thanks
--
View this message in context:
i load the same amount rows into a table and into a selectbox.
the selectbox takes evry long to load.
the table is after 2-3 seconds ready
is their any other solution, to load great lists into a selectbox?
--
10
Hi,
use the VirtualSelectBox instead for huge data.
Cheers,
Chris
Am 15.12.2011 13:13, schrieb smisonli...@googlemail.com:
i load the same amount rows into a table and into a selectbox.
the selectbox takes evry long to load.
the table is after 2-3 seconds ready
is their any other
Hello!
I do not speak english, so this text was confusing to me too... but seems
to be correct for me after a brief study. There is not a property value
in TextField: there is a setter, a getter, and a event, but the property
does not exist.
Hi
I believe your explanation is correct. I too investigated this and came
to the conclusion that the framework must be listening to the
changeValue event. I think the documentation should explain this
concept of listening to events when the property does not exist more
clearly.
I know
Hi
Yes I will open a bug report but I am curious what makes the difference
between the two. Why does return model ? model.getLastName() : data;
work whereas return model.getLastName(); does not work.
Simon
On 15/12/2011 2:05 AM, Martin Wittemann wrote:
Hey,
If I change your code to:
Hi,
you can find an explanation here:
-Original Message-
From: rsantiagopaz [mailto:rsantiago...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:29 PM
To: qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [qooxdoo-devel] Virtual SelectBox Question
little question: (sorry the english)
Why
Hi,
you can find an explanation here:
http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5711
Regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: rsantiagopaz [mailto:rsantiago...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:29 PM
To: qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [qooxdoo-devel]
Hi,
AFAIK there is no such option. The default behavior of the resize column model
is described here:
http://demo.qooxdoo.org/current/apiviewer/#qx.ui.table.columnmodel.resizebehavior.Default
Regards,
Alex
From: aditya siram [mailto:aditya.si...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Hi Chris
Just for completeness here is my code for my Virtual ComboBox class.
You can see that I bind the store model to my combobox model.
qx.Class.define(dcbase.comVirtual,
{
extend : qx.ui.form.VirtualComboBox,
construct : function (tmConfig)
{
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 08:13, Alexander Steitz
alexander.ste...@1und1.dewrote:
Hi,
AFAIK there is no such option. The default behavior of the resize column
model is described here:
http://demo.qooxdoo.org/current/apiviewer/#qx.ui.table.columnmodel.resizebehavior.Default
The data from the
2011/12/15 Simon White simonwh...@dciphercomputing.com
Hi
I believe your explanation is correct. I too investigated this and came
to the conclusion that the framework must be listening to the
changeValue event. I think the documentation should explain this
concept of listening to events
Yes! I've got now a reaction from Marshall Culpepper, member of the
Appcelerator core team:
http://developer.appcelerator.com/question/129475/v8-runtime-defines-objectprototypeextend-which-may-break-compatibility-to-javascript-framework#answer-225485
He opened an issue in the titanium jira:
Just for completeness I wanted to explain why my filter delegate did not
work.
I had mistakenly set the delegate as
{filter: function(data) {return (data.ATYPE=='F' data.Table ==
'ARMASTER.DBF')? true : false}}
First there should be no double quotes around the delegate as this makes
it a
Dear core team!
What would be the best git solution of contributed code?
- one repository independent of each contributed project?
Should every contribution have its own branch in a common repository i.e.
different from qooxdoo?
- this might be messy due to branches of each project
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:47, Stefan Andersson
stefan.anders...@live.comwrote:
Dear core team!
What would be the best git solution of contributed code?
- one repository independent of each contributed project?
Should every contribution have its own branch in a common repository i.e.
Am 15.12.2011 11:30, schrieb Stefan Andersson:
Btw: what runtime do you use in android? Is it Rhino or V8?
Android v 2.2 and concomitant js
Yes but which runtime? Do you use SDK before 1.8? Then you use Rhino.
Starting with SDK 1.8 you have the choice between V8 and Rhino.
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for the very quick answer. I did have to implement my own
DateChooser, but it was easy afterwards to make my DateChooser work with an
widget inherited from DateField.
Alice
--
View this message in context:
Hi
How does one do the equivalent of a ForEach on all the members they have
added to a form or container? I am use to using collections and being
able to iterate over the collection to access all the members but I am
not sure how this is done in QooxDoo. I do not want to access all the
Derrell!
Good to see it sharp in action!
How do you solve the login credentials for different users? Is it possible to
separate different users?
Now a submodule is as a branch and which makes it difficult to branch the
submodules without getting plotted. What is your solution to that?
Isn't
Hi
I am wondering how you can quickly find an item in a store. In my case
the stores contain data from a database table and every item has a
unique ID field so I would like to be able to quickly get to the item
using the ID or I also may want to find for example a customer by
name. How is
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 14:35, Stefan Andersson
stefan.anders...@live.comwrote:
Derrell!
Good to see it sharp in action!
How do you solve the login credentials for different users? Is it possible
to separate different users?
Each user has his own github account and ssh keys.
Now a
Hi,
The stores are nothing more than qx data structures, typically qx.data.Array
or a plain old qx object. There are no specific query helpers.
I have simple methods that iterate over my array looking for matches - you
wouldn't really need anything more than that.
Cheers
--
View this message in
Might be just my Google-fu, but I haven't really found a way to access
form elements or other Objects by name. In short, I'd find it pretty
convenient if there was a function/method/hash available somewhere (eg.
on the Root, or within a Window, or per container, or something like
that), where I
I think you seem to have answered the necessary questions and what you have
been doing here can be used for qooxdoo-contrib.
I would be glad to adhere to this approach if the core team can tell their
opinion.
Two more questions to the core team:
1. How does the generator comply with this?
So what do you actually need to do once to get a handle on these objects?
If you are talking about manipulating form data then you really should be
looking at the data binding packages and examples in the demo browser. With
data binding you don't really interact with the form widgets but you bind
And already fixed!
The fix is in
https://github.com/appcelerator/titanium_mobile/commit/80547393e763f38e344c33504ad80326a61f546f
and will make it into the upcomming GA releas of Titanium SDK 1.8.0.1 on
monday!
Best regards.
Dietrich.
Am 15.12.2011 16:10, schrieb Dietrich Streifert:
Yes!
Hello.
I want to know if somebody knows of any WYSIWYG GUI editor for qoxdoo
scripts.
-
Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that something
else is more important than fear. -- Ambrose Redmoon
Cactuar: Prettier than a Moogle, deadlier than a Behemoth.
--
View this
Try the .getChildren method.
T.
On 12/15/2011 08:33 PM, Simon White wrote:
Hi
How does one do the equivalent of a ForEach on all the members they have
added to a form or container? I am use to using collections and being
able to iterate over the collection to access all the members but I
You could use the ObjectRegistry, where you can get the hash of a qx
object (your ID), and later look it up from there using this hash. But
these wouldn't be self-assigned names (strings).
Going away from this.w and this.m you need also be concerned that
objects go out of scope and are
On 12/16/2011 08:31 AM, thron7 wrote:
You could use the ObjectRegistry, where you can get the hash of a qx
object (your ID), and later look it up from there using this hash. But
these wouldn't be self-assigned names (strings).
Going away from this.w and this.m you need also be concerned
Hey,
What would be the best git solution of contributed code?
We don't have a clear vision what to do with the contrib and how to move it to
git. But I think one thing is clear. In times of github, where everybody can
create a repo with one click, is no need for having such a general repositiry
40 matches
Mail list logo
