Hey,
That should work but I don’t see much of an advantage as the main reason
for the table widget would be user interaction.
You are right, basically is first time general curiosity about qx.Website,
but curiosity about sort/filter capabilities before printing too.
Sounds reasonable. :)
Hi !
I am looking for an alternative pendingbut it does not work in my example
*http://tinyurl.com/pbe5peo
Ideas ?
Johan
*
Le 24/03/2015 11:01, Johan a écrit :
Hi !
Thanks for your sharing but i'm already looking that...
Re-develop my accordion isn't easy... maybe using an other lib with
Anyone interested? i am going to give a try , if paragasu already doing
lets look into this.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Phyo Arkar phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com
wrote:
but looking at , http://materializecss.com/ it is much better vs google's
UX idea.
What you guys think? I think it will be
Perfect. Thank you again
--
View this message in context:
http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/question-about-qx-Website-tp7586995p7587007.html
Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Dive into the
