Re: [qooxdoo-devel] API docs for traditional Javascript objects

2011-02-21 Thread Martin Wittemann
Hey, about those topic, having stuff in the statics section, was a long discussion in a bug report: http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3194 Just take a look at the comments to get an impression. If we could enhance that functionality so that the API generator introspected on these member

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] API docs for traditional Javascript objects

2011-02-21 Thread thron7
Put this in a bug. T. On 02/18/2011 09:18 PM, aditya siram wrote: > It's desirable only because I want other developers (not just users) > to be able to read all my comments directly from the API viewer > without having to read the source. I use these maps when I want some > package up some funct

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] API docs for traditional Javascript objects

2011-02-18 Thread aditya siram
It's desirable only because I want other developers (not just users) to be able to read all my comments directly from the API viewer without having to read the source. I use these maps when I want some package up some functions without having to instantiate a new Qooxdoo class in a new file. I use

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] API docs for traditional Javascript objects

2011-02-18 Thread Martin Wittemann
Hey, > I have a number of members in my qooxdoo classes that are traditional > Javascript objects in my code like: > something : { > ... > } > > however any documentation I write for these does not show up in the > API viewer. Is there someway to get it show up? Thats not really the common use

[qooxdoo-devel] API docs for traditional Javascript objects

2011-02-17 Thread aditya siram
Hi all, I have a number of members in my qooxdoo classes that are traditional Javascript objects in my code like: something : { ... } however any documentation I write for these does not show up in the API viewer. Is there someway to get it show up? -deech