Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Is it possible to add another object to the converter for a singlevalue-binding?

While writing the post, I got an idea: would it be a proper way, to create a wrapping class for the value to bind which contains the method so it can be called in converter? My Real-World-example which is working (with Date instead of int, sorry for the confusion):

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Is it possible to add another object to the converter for a singlevalue-binding?

Okay, there is at least one more fallacy. If I add a method like the following to the DateWrapper to increase the date by x days, the label-binding wouldn't call the converter because the wrong key is listened. But if I am setting the binding-key to gameData.date.date, the converter would run but

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Scrollbars not showing in Chrome Version 49.0.2623.112 m

Hello John done, https://github.com/qooxdoo/qooxdoo/issues/202 Thxs, Werner On 4/13/16 9:51 PM, John Spackman wrote: > Hi Werner > > It looks like a bug to me - the issue is that the yellow bars on the side are > where the native scroll bars go, but on Chrome & Safari they do not appear. >

[qooxdoo-devel] Is it possible to add another object to the converter for a singlevalue-binding?

Hi everybody, is it possible, to pass or use another object from outside inside of the converter-method used in a singlevalue-binding? For e.g. I have this code: var someObjectFromOutside = new CoolObject(); var lblInfo = new qx.ui.basic.Label(); this.bind("propertyObject.intValue",

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Is it possible to add another object to the converter for a singlevalue-binding?

Finally I found a working solution. I'm not sure if I like that way but it works and its not that much more code. Following is the wrapper-class. It contains a new property which is set as the formatted date-string: qx.Class.define("mkss.data.DateWrapper", { extend: qx.core.Object,

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Is it possible to add another object to the converter for a singlevalue-binding?

I think that would work (although it's hard to be sure without a working example) but you could solve the initial problem with a closure. John > On 15 Apr 2016, at 20:44, LoneSurvivor wrote: > > While writing the post, I got an idea: would it be a proper way, to create a