[jira] Created: (QPID-1456) Misnamed virtual host in xml results in NPE

Misnamed virtual host in xml results in NPE --- Key: QPID-1456 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1456 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Bug Components: Java Broker Affects

[jira] Updated: (QPID-1300) CommitRollbackTest.testSend2ThenRollback failed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aidan Skinner updated QPID-1300: Priority: Major (was: Critical) This hasn't been happening frequently, so I'm downgrading the

[jira] Updated: (QPID-1456) Misnamed virtual host in xml results in NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aidan Skinner updated QPID-1456: Component/s: Starter Misnamed virtual host in xml results in NPE

Re: AMQP Paper, using Qpid

Carl, Thank you very much for the comments on our AMQP-Qpid paper and suggestions for future work. Hari (the first author) will be presenting the paper in Austin this Sunday at the Workshop for High Performance Computational Finance (WHPCF), which is part of the SC '08 Conference.

Re: AMQP Paper, using Qpid

Hi Carl, A question from our group about the following client params you mentioned in your email (included below): --max-frame-size N (65535)the maximum frame size to request. --bounds-multiplier N (2) bound size of write queue (as a multiple of

Re: AMQP Paper, using Qpid

gregory james marsh wrote: Hi Carl, A question from our group about the following client params you mentioned in your email (included below): --max-frame-size N (65535)the maximum frame size to request. --bounds-multiplier N (2) bound size of write queue (as a multiple of

Re: AMQP Paper, using Qpid

gregory james marsh wrote: Hi Carl, A question from our group about the following client params you mentioned in your email (included below): --max-frame-size N (65535)the maximum frame size to request. --bounds-multiplier N (2) bound size of write queue (as a multiple of

Re: M4 beta?

Aidan Skinner wrote: Hi guys, It's been almost 3 weeks since code freeze, is it time to cut a test release and put it out there for people to start trying? The only outstanding blocker seems to be QPID-1420, which looks like it's fixed, just needs to be reviewed? Rafi, is that right? Yes,

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-1438) Qpidd fails with the rdma transport module installed fails to start if the machine has no rdma devices

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Stitcher resolved QPID-1438. --- Resolution: Fixed Qpidd fails with the rdma transport module installed fails to start if the

Re: Slow consumer handling

My aim would be to get rid of MINA eventually... However there still needs to be some work to free the broker of dependence on Mina ByteBuffers etc (the I/O layer I've written just wraps the java.nio buffers in Mina buffers before passing them to the rest of the broker). I see that as a

M4 beta?

Hi guys, It's been almost 3 weeks since code freeze, is it time to cut a test release and put it out there for people to start trying? The only outstanding blocker seems to be QPID-1420, which looks like it's fixed, just needs to be reviewed? Rafi, is that right? - Aidan -- Apache Qpid - World

[jira] Updated: (QPID-1454) NullPointerException in AMQProtocolHandler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aidan Skinner updated QPID-1454: Priority: Major (was: Blocker) For this to be a problem you have to be blocking failover from

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-1391) Reliability tests fail, broker is unable to process connections

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aidan Skinner resolved QPID-1391. - Resolution: Invalid This appears to have been an environmental issue with the machine in

Re: M4 beta?

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Rafael Schloming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think there are probably few more JIRAs that should be resolved before we call anything beta, e.g.: QPID-1454 This isn't as bad as it looks, you have to be blocking failover to hit this (which is uncommon to say the

[VOTE] Qpid Graduation - for top level

It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list that Qpid would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC felt that the Qpid project should increase its diversity. Over the intervening months Qpid has added more independents to the project

Re: [VOTE] Qpid Graduation - for top level

+1 ...ant On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list that Qpid would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC felt that the Qpid project should increase its

Re: M4 beta?

I'd like to get something up so people can start testing and we can get a firm schedule together. We can always call it an alpha if necessary. ;) yea, getting an alpha or beta out would be good. We can then see how the testing goes, I still see people finding blockers and fixing them,

[jira] Created: (QPID-1458) C++ common compile error in VC9 Release mode

C++ common compile error in VC9 Release mode Key: QPID-1458 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1458 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Bug Components: C++ Broker, C++ Client

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-1457) Impossible to suspend a foreground qpidd

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Stitcher resolved QPID-1457. --- Resolution: Fixed Removed the signal handling code ignoring SIGTSTP / SIGTTIN / SIGTTOU Can

Re: Slow consumer handling

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Robert Godfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/11/11 Aidan Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think MINA is being tossed as we work to 0-10 in Java. Agree that the slow connection problem on

Re: M4 beta?

Rafael Schloming wrote: Aidan Skinner wrote: Hi guys, It's been almost 3 weeks since code freeze, is it time to cut a test release and put it out there for people to start trying? The only outstanding blocker seems to be QPID-1420, which looks like it's fixed, just needs to be reviewed? Rafi,

[jira] Created: (QPID-1457) Impossible to suspend a foreground qpidd

Impossible to suspend a foreground qpidd Key: QPID-1457 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1457 Project: Qpid Issue Type: Bug Components: C++ Broker Affects Versions: M4

Re: [VOTE] Qpid Graduation - for top level

My +1 (mentor/IPMC) Paul On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:03 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 ...ant On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list that Qpid would like to graduate.

Re: [VOTE] Qpid Graduation - for top level

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My +1 (mentor/IPMC) I never know if we need to vote again ;) My +1 as well, with both mentor and IPMC hats. Yoav

Re: [VOTE] Qpid Graduation - for top level

Over the past several months, I've watched the qpid community work together and I'm persuaded that the project is ready to graduate. +1 Craig On Nov 12, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list that Qpid would like

Re: [VOTE] Qpid Graduation - for top level

+1 binding Dan On Wednesday 12 November 2008 3:51:31 pm Carl Trieloff wrote: It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list that Qpid would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC felt that the Qpid project should increase its diversity.