On Saturday, July 23, 2016 at 4:54:53 PM UTC-4, Qubed One wrote:
> raahe...@gmail.com:
> > On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 7:24:16 PM UTC-4, raah...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >> On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 6:03:23 PM UTC-4, Qubed One wrote:
> >>> Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at
raahe...@gmail.com:
> On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 7:24:16 PM UTC-4, raah...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 6:03:23 PM UTC-4, Qubed One wrote:
>>> Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:36:42AM -0700, raahe...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Will we be able to
On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 7:24:16 PM UTC-4, raah...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 6:03:23 PM UTC-4, Qubed One wrote:
> > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
> > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:36:42AM -0700, raahe...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> Will we be able to upgrade to 3.2 from dom0 update
On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 6:03:23 PM UTC-4, Qubed One wrote:
> Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:36:42AM -0700, raahe...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Will we be able to upgrade to 3.2 from dom0 update eventually? Or if we
> >> choose not to reinstall is there security
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:36:42AM -0700, raahe...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Will we be able to upgrade to 3.2 from dom0 update eventually? Or if we
>> choose not to reinstall is there security implications?
>
> Yes. Experimental instruction already online:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 03:26:43AM -0700, Drew White wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 04:23:31 UTC+10, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:36:42AM -0700, raah...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > > Will we be able to
On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 04:23:31 UTC+10, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:36:42AM -0700, raah...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > Will we be able to upgrade to 3.2 from dom0 update eventually? Or if we
> choose not to reinstall is there security implications?
>
>
On 06/28/2016 02:23 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:36:42AM -0700, raahe...@gmail.com wrote:
Will we be able to upgrade to 3.2 from dom0 update eventually? Or if we choose
not to reinstall is there security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:36:42AM -0700, raahe...@gmail.com wrote:
> Will we be able to upgrade to 3.2 from dom0 update eventually? Or if we
> choose not to reinstall is there security implications?
Yes. Experimental instruction already online:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 1:45:48 AM UTC-4, mmih...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > one other thing i noticed a while ago - the dracut text-mode
> > > installer does not show the pop-up asking the user for the LUKS
> > > passphrase, the installation doesn't work because of that.. bug?
> > > feature?
Hi Marek,
Firstly, thank you (and all the Qubes-OS team) for all your great work and
the progress you are making. I am sure the community greatly appreciates
everything you guys are doing.
Now, I was wondering how the progress with the windows tools is going. Has
there been any progress on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-06-19 08:48, derfake...@gmail.com wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 10:49:02 AM UTC+2, Marek
> Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>> [ ... 3.2 rc1 release ... ]
>
> i gave the iso a spin, first booted via UEFI, which made the
>
hi,
On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 10:49:02 AM UTC+2, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
> [ ... 3.2 rc1 release ... ]
i gave the iso a spin, first booted via UEFI, which made the installer hang
half way through at "installing bootloader". rebooted using legacy grub, all
shiny. then during
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Great!
Thanks!
Le 18/06/2016 à 10:48, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki a écrit :
> Details here:
> https://www.qubes-os.org/news/2016/06/18/qubes-OS-3-2-rc1-has-been-rel
eased/
>
>
>
As usual, you can download new image from:
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
