To give some background: it is true that the RGsetEx object (in
data/RGsetEx.rda) is a 1-1 correspondence with the raw data files in
inst/extdata, so one could consider it redundant. However, having the IDAT
files are convenient for testing parsing, and also for other tools who want
to have 450k
Thanks for the prompt answer. The data set I am packaging closely
resembles that of minfiData except that there are 52 samples; the IDAT
files together are some 800MB whereas the Rda file is closer to 150MB.
It is worth noting that my experiment data package will be submitted
to Bioconductor
On 07/11/2013, at 09:35 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
I agree that the handling of \b is not that strange, once one agrees
on what \b actually means, i.e. go back one character and not
delete previous character.
The fact that R GUI on Mac and Windows interprets/renders it
differently shows that
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jari Oksanen jari.oksa...@oulu.fi wrote:
On 07/11/2013, at 09:35 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
I agree that the handling of \b is not that strange, once one agrees
on what \b actually means, i.e. go back one character and not
delete previous character.
It means,
On 07 Nov 2013, at 10:13 , Barry Rowlingson b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jari Oksanen jari.oksa...@oulu.fi wrote:
On 07/11/2013, at 09:35 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
I agree that the handling of \b is not that strange, once one agrees
on what \b
Hi!
I didn't wanted to do this but I think that this is the easiest way
for you to understand my problem (thanks again for all the comments
that you have made). Here is a copy of the function that I'm working
on. This may be tedious to analyze, so I understand if you don't feel
keen to give it a
Hello,
Any particular reason you're not using Rcpp? You would have access to
nice abstraction instead of these MACROS all over the place.
The cost of these abstractions is close to 0.
Looping around and SET_LENGTH is going to be quite expensive. I would
urge you to accumulate data in data
Romain,
Thanks for your quick response. I've already received that suggestion,
but, besides of haven't ever used C++, I wanted to understand first
what am I doing wrong. Still, would you give me a small example, in R
C++, of:
- Creating a generic vector L1 of size N
- Creating a data.frame D
Le 07/11/2013 14:30, George Vega Yon a écrit :
Romain,
Thanks for your quick response. I've already received that suggestion,
but, besides of haven't ever used C++, I wanted to understand first
what am I doing wrong.
For that type of code, it is actually quite simpler to learn c++ than it
is
Le 07/11/2013 14:43, Romain Francois a écrit :
Le 07/11/2013 14:30, George Vega Yon a écrit :
Romain,
Thanks for your quick response. I've already received that suggestion,
but, besides of haven't ever used C++, I wanted to understand first
what am I doing wrong.
For that type of code, it is
Over the years, this has been useful to me (not just in R) for many
nonlinear optimization tasks. The alternatives often clutter the screen.
On 13-11-06 06:00 AM, r-devel-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
People do sometimes use this pattern for displaying progress (e.g. iteration
counts).
Thank you very much! Just what I needed.
Too bad I never got to understand what was wrong with my original code...
Thanks again!
George Vega Yon
+56 9 7 647 2552
http://ggvega.cl
2013/11/7 Romain Francois rom...@r-enthusiasts.com:
Le 07/11/2013 14:43, Romain Francois a écrit :
Le
Is there an R-language interface to the R API C-language functions
Rf_logspace_add()
and Rf_logspace_sub()? I don't see one but I may not looking under the
right name.
Various packages have functions which do that same sort
of thing (log(exp(x)+exp(y)) and log(exp(x)-exp(y)) without
13 matches
Mail list logo
