Friedrich Leisch wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:40:04 +0100,
Romain Francois (RF) wrote:
Hello,
Sweave lets you use alternative drivers through the driver argument,
and
several packages take advantage of that and define custom Sweave
driver
for various purposes. Most of
Hello,
Sweave lets you use alternative drivers through the driver argument, and
several packages take advantage of that and define custom Sweave driver
for various purposes. Most of them are listed on the Reproducible
Research CTV:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:40:04 +0100,
Romain Francois (RF) wrote:
Hello,
Sweave lets you use alternative drivers through the driver argument, and
several packages take advantage of that and define custom Sweave driver
for various purposes. Most of them are listed on the Reproducible
Le 14/12/10 13:21, Friedrich Leisch a écrit :
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:40:04 +0100,
Romain Francois (RF) wrote:
Hello,
Sweave lets you use alternative drivers through the driver argument, and
several packages take advantage of that and define custom Sweave driver
for various
Another question about Sweave (actually it is more a question
about TeX). Is there a reliable (system-independent) way to
use Sweave.sty without having to place it in the current working
directory? MiKTeX under Windows has dropped the use of
TEXINPUTS, and this complicates the problem.
On 14/12/2010 9:54 AM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
Another question about Sweave (actually it is more a question
about TeX). Is there a reliable (system-independent) way to
use Sweave.sty without having to place it in the current working
directory? MiKTeX under Windows has dropped the use of
Both of my questions were not clear, sorry.
What I really want to do is have a customized version of Sweave.sty
(Sweave++.sty)
included automatically from some designated area, like the include directory
of another
package, rather than requiring the user to keep a version in the local
directory.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Duncan Murdoch
murdoch.dun...@gmail.comwrote:
On 14/12/2010 10:52 AM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
Both of my questions were not clear, sorry.
What I really want to do is have a customized version of Sweave.sty
(Sweave++.sty)
included automatically from some
