I hereby protest strongly against the misuse of this thread through
unnecessary and pointless discussions. My request was satisfactorily
answered with references to R libraries and legitimate warnings about
the use of zero-based indexing schemes in R. If you want to continue
the discussions,
Note that elt(x, -1) is NOT AN OCCURRENCE OF AN EXISTING OPERATION.
It's a call to elt(-,-), which has its own semantics.
And the semantics of (x, i) when i is outside the interval
[0,length(x)) is UNDEFINED.
# elt(x, i) where i is numeric and all(0 <= i & i < length(x)) selects
one or more
#
No, my claim ISN'T false, In fact, it CANNOT be.
Here's my claim again, in slow speed.
1. The goal is to get the EFFECT of 0-origin indexing, Not
necessarily the syntax.
2. Rule A. NO NEW DATA TYPES.
3, Rule B. NO CHANGES TO EXISTING OPERATIONS, INCLUDING "[" and "[<-",
>From rules A and B, it
The build system rolled up R-4.4.0.tar.gz and R-4.4.0.tar.xz (codename "Puppy
Cup") this morning.
This is a major update, containing many new features and bug fixes.
The list below details the changes in this release.
You can get the source code from
4 matches
Mail list logo
