Re: [R] R-help Digest, Vol 171, Issue 20

and they answered that their results were checked against GENSTAT. I think it is not really a good think for the R community to compute a REML likelihood that is probably not the REML likelihood. Brigitte Brigitte Mangin, INRA, LIPM, CS 52627, 31326 CASTANET-TOLOSAN tel: 33 + (0)5 61 28 54 58

Re: [R] mixed Model: asreml-r versus nmle,lme4 or coxme

. And that, it is a big concern. De : Thierry Onkelinx <thierry.onkel...@inbo.be> Envoy� : vendredi 19 mai 2017 16:40 � : Brigitte Mangin Cc : r-h...@lists.r-project.org Objet : Re: [R] mixed Model: asreml-r versus nmle,lme4 or coxme Dear Brigitte, Maybe b

[R] mixed Model: asreml-r versus nmle,lme4 or coxme

Hi, Did somebody know why asreml does not provide the same REML loglikehood as coxme, lme4 or lmne. Here is a simple example showing the differences: ### library(lme4) library(coxme) library(asreml) library(nlme)