Hi all,
I have a matrix of correlation values between all pairwise comparison in
an experiment. For example, I have 2 time points (1,2) each in
triplicate. Thus, I have the following matrix
1-1
1-2
1-3
2-1
2-2
2-3
1-1
NA
...
...
...
...
...
1-2
...
NA
...
...
...
...
I apologize for the previous post using HTML. Haven't posted for a while and
e-mail client default.
Best,
Ken
Hi all,
I have a matrix of correlation values between all pairwise comparison in an
experiment. For example, I have 2 time points (1,2) each in triplicate. Thus,
I have the
Hi all,
I need a little help with flow control in R. What I'd like to do is to
advance a for loop by changing its counter. However, what seems obvious
to me does not yield the proper results. An example of my problem is
for (i in seq(1, some_number, some_increment)){
some stuff
Dear list,
I have a list of number sequences. Each number sequence has different
numbers of elements. Is there a quick way (other than to iterate
through the entire list) way to coerce list to matrix with NAs filling
in the short sequences?
An example of what I mean is this:
A -
Hi all,
I know this is an idiotic question, but I am trying to iterate through a
list of data.frame using ls (I have named the data frames in a way that
lets me subset them with ls(pattern=test, for example). But ls
returns a character vector. How to I refer to the data frames by their
names in
Hi all,
I am running into a snag using quantile function in stats. Basically, I
don't understand why the loop below throws the error that it does.
test.data - rnorm(1000, 0, 1)
for (i in seq(0.1, 0.001, 0.1)){
test - quantile(test.data, probs=seq(0,1,i));
print(i);
}
Hi all,
I am running into a snag using quantile function in stats. Basically, I
don't understand why the loop below throws the error that it does.
test.data - rnorm(1000, 0, 1)
for (i in seq(0.1, 0.001, 0.1)){
test - quantile(test.data, probs=seq(0,1,i));
print(i);
}
Dear all,
I have come across a strange behavior of the %/% operator, and I wasn't
sure if this was intended.
i.e.
a - 1.2
b - 1.0
(a-b) %/% 0.1 results in 1?
Whereas
0.2 %/% 0.1 results in 2.
Am I missing something obvious here? It seems to be consistent up to R
2.6.0 running
2051,0.00582,-0.019189,-0.009029,0.001875,0.015273,0.175303,-0.092441,-0
.086738,-0.022871,0.027852,-0.108809,0.005938,-0.016543,-0.019288,0.2105
66,-0.022813,-0.001748,-0.108574,0.164971,-0.075186)
If anyone could help me out, I would be extremely grateful.
Best,
Ken Lo
,-0.218613,0.024902,0.020273,0.011914,0.162051,0.00582,-0.019189,-0.009029,0.001875,0.015273,0.175303,-0.092441,-0.086738,-0.022871,0.027852,-0.108809,0.005938,-0.016543,-0.019288,0.210566,-0.022813,-0.001748,-0.108574,0.164971,-0.075186)
If anyone could help me out, I would be extremely grateful.
Best,
Ken Lo
10 matches
Mail list logo
