Re: [R] function in nls argument

Thank you Katharine. I am certain nprint is affecting my solution. Let me know how I can send the data (~300Kb). The script I used it: ST1 - ST04 SM1 - SM08 SR1 - SRch2 ST - ST1 [!is.na(SR1)] SM - SM1 [!is.na(SR1)] SR - SR1 [!is.na(SR1)] q - 0.90 p - c(a=-0.003, b=0.13, c=0.50,

Re: [R] function in nls argument

Find the data (data_nls.lm_moyano.txt) here: ftp://ftp.bgc-jena.mpg.de/pub/outgoing/fmoyano Katharine Mullen wrote: Thanks for the details - it sounds like a bug. You can either send me the data in an email off-list or make it available on-line somewhere, so that I and other people can

Re: [R] function in nls argument

I've basically solved the problem using the nls.lm function from the minpack.lm (thanks Katharine) with some modifications for ignoring residuals above a given percentile. This is to avoid the strong influence of points which push my modeled vs. measured values away from the 1:1 line. I based it