see below.
2010/11/21 Uwe Ligges lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de:
On 21.11.2010 18:13, Kjetil Halvorsen wrote:
?save.image
And at this point it has been running with one cpu at 100% for over an
hour!
It's OK to take an hour (due to memory - disc IO) if it uses swap space
heavily.
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:03:54 -0300
From: kjetilbrinchmannhalvor...@gmail.com
To: lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
CC: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] ?summaryRprof running at 100% cpu for one hour ...
see below.
2010/11/21 Uwe Ligges
] ?summaryRprof running at 100% cpu for one hour ...
see below.
2010/11/21 Uwe Ligges :
On 21.11.2010 18:13, Kjetil Halvorsen wrote:
?save.image
And at this point it has been running with one cpu at 100% for over an
hour!
It's OK to take an hour (due to memory - disc IO
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:41:06 -0300
Subject: Re: [R] ?summaryRprof running at 100% cpu for one hour ...
From: kjetilbrinchmannhalvor...@gmail.com
To: marchy...@hotmail.com
CC: lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de; r-help@r-project.org
see below
see below.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Mike Marchywka marchy...@hotmail.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:41:06 -0300
Subject: Re: [R] ?summaryRprof running at 100% cpu for one hour ...
From: kjetilbrinchmannhalvor...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:59:04 -0300
Subject: Re: [R] ?summaryRprof running at 100% cpu for one hour ...
From: kjetilbrinchmannhalvor...@gmail.com
To: marchy...@hotmail.com
CC: lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de; r-help@r-project.org
see below
On 21.11.2010 01:30, Kjetil Halvorsen wrote:
see below.
2010/11/20 Uwe Liggeslig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de:
On 19.11.2010 21:43, Kjetil Halvorsen wrote:
This is very strange. (Debian squeeze, R 2.12.0 compiled from source)
I did some moderately large computation (including svd of a
OK, trying it on a 8Gb Windows machine with R-2.12.0 64-bit it runs
within less than 2 minutes in 5Gb of RAM.
That means your machine is probably swapping heavily and is therefore
extremely slow.
Nevertheless, this seems to be unrelated with summaryRprof(). The
anacor() call is roughly
On 19.11.2010 21:43, Kjetil Halvorsen wrote:
This is very strange. (Debian squeeze, R 2.12.0 compiled from source)
I did some moderately large computation (including svd of a 560x50 matrix),
running a few minutes, and R memory increasing to about 900MB on this
2 GB ram laptop. I had done
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:45:42 +0100
From: lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
To: kjetilbrinchmannhalvor...@gmail.com
CC: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] ?summaryRprof running at 100% cpu for one hour ...
On 19.11.2010 21:43, Kjetil Halvorsen wrote:
This is very strange
see below.
2010/11/20 Uwe Ligges lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de:
On 19.11.2010 21:43, Kjetil Halvorsen wrote:
This is very strange. (Debian squeeze, R 2.12.0 compiled from source)
I did some moderately large computation (including svd of a 560x50
matrix),
running a few minutes, and R
OK . I will try to give an reproducible example.
the code I give refer to a 72x72 matrix Wna, which is given at the
end of this message.
This matrix contains NA's on the diagonal.I try an correspondence
analysis on this matrix,
with package anacor, which supports correspondence analysis of
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 21:30:38 -0300
From: kjetilbrinchmannhalvor...@gmail.com
To: lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
CC: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] ?summaryRprof running at 100% cpu for one hour ...
see below.
2010/11/20 Uwe Ligges :
On 19.11.2010 21:43, Kjetil
This is very strange. (Debian squeeze, R 2.12.0 compiled from source)
I did some moderately large computation (including svd of a 560x50 matrix),
running a few minutes, and R memory increasing to about 900MB on this
2 GB ram laptop. I had done Rprof(memory.profiling=TRUE) first.
Then doing
14 matches
Mail list logo
