On 27/02/2011 05:46, Robert A LaBudde wrote:
I think you are over-concerned with the term pseudo-replication. All
this means is that the error source is nested, and not a full replicate.
What you haven't done, and need to do, is to describe your experiment
in terms of the real variables and
On 25/02/2011 21:22, Ben Ward wrote:
Original Message
Subject:Re: [R] ANOVA and Pseudoreplication in R
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:10:14 -0800
From: Bert Guntergunter.ber...@gene.com
To: Ben Wardbenjamin.w...@bathspa.org
CC: r-helpr-help@r-project.org
I
Hi Ben:
1) Confession: I did not and have not read your post in detail.
2) IMHO, the following advice:
Pseudo replication is really about a lack of independence between
measurements, So you need to work backwards and see where you are building
in a known lack of independence. And where that
I think you are over-concerned with the term pseudo-replication.
All this means is that the error source is nested, and not a full replicate.
What you haven't done, and need to do, is to describe your experiment
in terms of the real variables and error sources. Then code them as
fixed or
4 matches
Mail list logo
