Both versions of this should have worked, but you are right that the first
version didn't when used with `gamm', I've fixed this for mgcv 1.6-2
(`mgcv:gam' was ok). Thanks for this.
best,
Simon
On Wednesday 14 April 2010 09:03, JANSEN, Ivy wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the book on Mixed Effects
I was not sure whether using the smoother as presented would give
exactly the same result as using two linear terms and 2 smoothers, and
wanted to check this.
Regards,
Ivy
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Gavin Simpson [mailto:gavin.simp...@ucl.ac.uk]
Verzonden: woensdag 14 april 2010
Hi,
I was reading the book on Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in
Ecology with R by Zuur et al.
In Section 6.2, an example is discussed where a gamm-model is fitted,
with a smoother for time, which differs for each value of ID (4
different bird species). In earlier versions of R, the
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 10:03 +0200, JANSEN, Ivy wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the book on Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in
Ecology with R by Zuur et al.
In Section 6.2, an example is discussed where a gamm-model is fitted,
with a smoother for time, which differs for each value of ID (4
4 matches
Mail list logo
