...@virgilio.itmailto:angelo.arc...@virgilio.itangelo.arc...@virgilio.itmailto:angelo.arc...@virgilio.it,
bgunter.4...@gmail.commailto:bgunter.4...@gmail.com
Cc: r-help@r-project.orgmailto:r-help@r-project.org
Ogg: Re: R: Re: [R] R: Re: Differences in output of lme() when introducing
interactions
Dear
Dear Terry,
I am very grateful to you for such a detailed and helpful answer.
Following your recommendation then I will skip the method presented at
http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/faq/type3.htm
So far, based on my understanding of R I arrived to the conclusion that the
correct way to see if
17.56
A: angelo.arc...@virgilio.itangelo.arc...@virgilio.it,
r-help@r-project.org
Ogg: Re: [R] Differences in output of lme() when introducing interactions
In-line
On 20/07/2015 15:10, angelo.arc...@virgilio.it wrote:
Dear List Members,
I am searching for correlations between a dependent
?
Thanks in advance
Angelo
Messaggio originale
Da: li...@dewey.myzen.co.uk
Data: 20-lug-2015 17.56
A: angelo.arc...@virgilio.itangelo.arc...@virgilio.it,
r-help@r-project.org
Ogg: Re: [R] Differences in output of lme() when introducing interactions
In-line
On 20/07/2015 15:10, angelo.arc
4 matches
Mail list logo