On Jul 14, 2011, at 20:19 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 14/07/2011 12:46 PM, warmstron1 wrote:
I resolved this issue. It appears that ^ won't work for this case, but
** worked. I can't find any reference to this, but where ^ seems to be
used to raise a value to a numerical function, ** is
Forgive me. I had a legitimate problem that I found resolvable using **
instead of ^. I can't seem to recreate the problem to obtain the error
message that I was receiving. Incomplete information is perhaps more
appropriate than *mis*information.
Here is the exact code I used (still not
warmstron1 wrote:
for(j in 1:J)
+ {
+ Z - dummy**B[j]
+ U - (-dummy+1)**B[j]
+ }
Z
I replaced ** with ^ and got the same results as you.
But why are you doing a for loop here?
At each iteration you are overwriting the previous results of Z and U and
retaining only the values obtained
I resolved this issue. It appears that ^ won't work for this case, but
** worked. I can't find any reference to this, but where ^ seems to be
used to raise a value to a numerical function, ** is used for a y raised
to the power of x where x it a computation.
--
View this message in context:
On 14/07/2011 12:46 PM, warmstron1 wrote:
I resolved this issue. It appears that ^ won't work for this case, but
** worked. I can't find any reference to this, but where ^ seems to be
used to raise a value to a numerical function, ** is used for a y raised
to the power of x where x it a
I am trying to create a set of wavelets in frequency space--namely Cauchy
wavelets for an intensity analysis (von Tscharner, 2000). The wavelets are
defined by the following formula:
[(f/cf)^(cf*scale)]*[e^((-f/cf)+1)^(cf*scale)]
where *f *is frequency of length *n*, *cf* is center frequency
6 matches
Mail list logo
