--
David L Carlson
Department of Anthropology
Texas A University
College Station, TX 77843-4352
From: Jose Claudio Faria
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 2:01 PM
To: David L Carlson
Cc: Jeff Newmiller ; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] cut{base}: is it a b
t; Department of Anthropology
>> Texas A University
>> College Station, TX 77843-4352
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeff Newmiller
>> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 10:41 AM
>> To: r-help@r-project.org; David L Carlson ; Jose
>> Claudio F
gt; College Station, TX 77843-4352
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Newmiller
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 10:41 AM
> To: r-help@r-project.org; David L Carlson ; Jose
> Claudio Faria ; r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] cut{base}: is it a bug?
>
> "
avid L Carlson ; Jose Claudio
Faria ; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] cut{base}: is it a bug?
"Subtracting a bit" only fixes the problem for the test data... it introduces a
bias in any continuous data you happen to throw at it. However, if you have
data with k
gt;[1.59,1.79)6
>[1.79,1.99)5
>[1.99,2.19]6
>
>
>David L Carlson
>Department of Anthropology
>Texas A University
>College Station, TX 77843-4352
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: R-help On Behalf Of Jose Claud
5
[1.99,2.19]6
David L Carlson
Department of Anthropology
Texas A University
College Station, TX 77843-4352
-Original Message-
From: R-help On Behalf Of Jose Claudio Faria
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 9:32 AM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] cut{
Dears members,
Is the below a bug of the cut {base} function?
dat <- c(
0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.7, 0.7, 0.7, 0.7, 0.7, #(8)
0.8, 0.8, 0.8, 0.9, 0.9, 0.9, 0.9,#(7)
1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.1, 1.1, 1.1,#(7)
1.2, 1.2, 1.2, 1.2, 1.3, 1.3, 1.3,#(7)
1.4, 1.4, 1.4, 1.5, 1.5, 1.5,
7 matches
Mail list logo