Hi,
Try this:
Spec - function(lista,FDR_k) {
list.new-lapply(lista,function(x) within(x,{spec- as.character(spec)}))
split.list-split(list.new,names(lista))
#Data needed with FDRFDR_k
seq.mod.z-lapply(seq_along(split.list),function(i)
lapply(split.list[[i]],function(x)
veracosta...@gmail.com
Cc: R help r-help@r-project.org
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [R] new question
Hi,
Try this:
Spec - function(lista,FDR_k) {
list.new-lapply(lista,function(x) within(x,{spec- as.character(spec)}))
split.list-split(list.new,names(lista))
#Data
: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [R] new question
Hi,
The function outputs the unique rows and also chisq test on frequency ( by row).
Spec - function(lista,FDR_k) {
list.new-lapply(lista,function(x) within(x,{spec- as.character(spec)}))
split.list-split(list.new,names(lista
Hi,
Regarding the first question:
ListFacGroup- lapply(ListFacGroup,unique)
Spec(ListFacGroup,0.05)
#
# Seq Mod z a2 c2 c3 t2
#1 aAATATAGPR 1-n_acPro/ 2 1 0 0 1
#2 aAAASSPVGVGQR
Hi,
Try this: (Used the old data folder)
Compares the spec counts of sub directory with each other.
directory- /home/arunksa111/dados
GetFileList - function(directory,number){
setwd(directory)
filelist1-dir()[file.info(dir())$isdir]
direct-dir(directory,pattern =
Sorry, I am not sure I understand your question.
You have 5 boxplots(if I remember correctly) on a single page and these 5
boxplots have titles a1,a2,c1,c2,t1 (or something like that).
Could you try:
par(mfcol(c(3,2)) and see if that helps. (not tested)
A.K.
Hi,
Try this:
directory- /home/arunksa111/dados
GetFileList - function(directory,number){
setwd(directory)
filelist1-dir()[file.info(dir())$isdir]
direct-dir(directory,pattern = paste(MSMS_,number,PepInfo.txt,sep=),
full.names = FALSE, recursive = TRUE)
direct-lapply(direct,function(x)
I deleted the 't' subfolders from the dados folder.
If you don't have 't' folders, wouldn't it be better to use:
directory- /home/arunksa111/dados
FacGroup-c(0,1,0,2,2,0,0)
#instead of
#FacGroup-c(0,1,0,2,2,0,3)
FacGroup-c(0,1,0,2,2,0,3)
lista[FacGroup!=0]
#[1]
z.boxplot- function(lst){
new.list- lapply(lst,function(x) x[x$FDR0.01,])
print(new.list)
par(mfrow=c(2,2))
b1-lapply(names(new.list),function(x) lapply(new.list[x],function(y)
boxplot(FDR~z,data=y,xlab=Charge,ylab=FDR,main=x)))
}
z.boxplot(ListFacGroup) #prints new.list
If you want to
Hi,
Try this:
directory- /home/arunksa111/dados
#modified the function
GetFileList - function(directory,number){
setwd(directory)
filelist1-dir()
lista-dir(directory,pattern = paste(MSMS_,number,PepInfo.txt,sep=),
full.names = TRUE, recursive = TRUE)
output- list(filelist1,lista)
Hi,
directory- /home/arunksa111/dados #renamed directory to dados
filelist-function(directory,number,list1){
setwd(directory)
filelist1-dir(directory)
direct-dir(directory,pattern = paste(MSMS_,number,PepInfo.txt,sep=),
full.names = FALSE, recursive = TRUE)
list1-lapply(direct, function(x)
Hi,
directory- /home/arunksa111/data.new
#first function
filelist-function(directory,number,list1){
setwd(directory)
filelist1-dir(directory)
direct-dir(directory,pattern = paste(MSMS_,number,PepInfo.txt,sep=),
full.names = FALSE, recursive = TRUE)
list1-lapply(direct, function(x)
Hi,
Are you sure? That's not what I got:
require(epicalc)
?logistic.display
model0 - glm(case ~ induced + spontaneous, family=binomial, data=infert)
logistic.display(model0)
Logistic regression predicting case
crude OR(95%CI) adj. OR(95%CI)P(Wald's test)
I forgot to mention (sorry for double posting) that str(infert) shows that
induced and spontaneous are not factors:
'data.frame': 248 obs. of 8 variables:
$ education : Factor w/ 3 levels 0-5yrs,6-11yrs,..: 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
2 2 2 ...
$ age : num 26 42 39 34 35 36 23 32 21 28 ...
$
Hi lm_mengxin,
If that's the case, just use as.factor():
fit - glm(case ~ as.factor(induced) + as.factor(spontaneous),
family=binomial, data=infert)
logistic.display(fit)
OR lower95ci upper95ci Pr(|Z|)
as.factor(induced)1 1.585398 0.7972313 3.152769
According to the example of logistic.display:
model0 - glm(case ~ induced + spontaneous, family=binomial, data=infert)
summary(model0)
logistic.display(model0)
induced: 3levels 0,1,2
spontaneous: 3levels 0,1,2
So if 0 is reference, we should get 2 OR for induced1, induced2,
spontaneous1,
Yes,it works well.
Thanks for your help.
At 2011-12-14 13:06:14,Jorge I Velez jorgeivanve...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi lm_mengxin,
If that's the case, just use as.factor():
fit - glm(case ~ as.factor(induced) + as.factor(spontaneous),
family=binomial, data=infert)
logistic.display(fit)
17 matches
Mail list logo