Re: [R] question about svm(e1071)

2011-01-17 Thread mutohrn
１ＧＢＩＯＩＮＦ) Cc: r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] question about svm(e1071) Looking at your results suggests that differences are probably based on expected minor numerical inaccuracies and the possibly alternating sign of the support vectors. Best, Uwe Ligges On 13.01.2011 01:28, muto

Re: [R] question about svm(e1071)

2011-01-14 Thread Uwe Ligges
Looking at your results suggests that differences are probably based on expected minor numerical inaccuracies and the possibly alternating sign of the support vectors. Best, Uwe Ligges On 13.01.2011 01:28, muto...@chugai-pharm.co.jp wrote: Dear all, I executed svm calculation using e1071

[R] question about svm(e1071)

2011-01-12 Thread mutohrn
Dear all, I executed svm calculation using e1071 library with a microarray data (http://www.iu.a.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~kadota/R/data_Singh_RMA_3274.txt). Then, I shuffled the data samples and executed svm calculation again. The results of 2 calculation were different (in SV, coefs and weights). I