Hi
now I'd like to do
for (colname in c('ColName1','ColName2','ColName3')) {
dat - measurements$colname
But that does not work, though I can write
measurements$C1 (same as measurements$C1)
(but different to measurements[C1]!)
Can you give me a hint?
greetings
Christof
Am
measurements[[colname]]
?'[['
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Christof Kluß ckl...@email.uni-kiel.de wrote:
Hi
now I'd like to do
for (colname in c('ColName1','ColName2','ColName3')) {
dat - measurements$colname
But that does not work, though I can write
measurements$C1 (same as
Hi Dennis,
thank you very much. That works fine.
Is there a possibility that R continue even if one of the models is not
solvable? R currently terminates with an error message.
greetings
Christof
Am 27-11-2011 01:34, schrieb Dennis Murphy:
vars- c('y1', 'y2', 'y3')
# Function to create
Look into tryCatch() for error handling.
Michael
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Christof Kluß ckl...@email.uni-kiel.de wrote:
Hi Dennis,
thank you very much. That works fine.
Is there a possibility that R continue even if one of the models is not
solvable? R currently terminates with an
Hi
I would like to shorten
mod1 - nls(ColName2 ~ ColName1, data = table, ...)
mod2 - nls(ColName3 ~ ColName1, data = table, ...)
mod3 - nls(ColName4 ~ ColName1, data = table, ...)
...
is there something like
cols = c(ColName2,ColName3,ColName4,...)
for i in ...
mod[i-1] - nls(ColName[i] ~
Hi:
Here's one way you could do it. I manufactured some fake data with a
simple model to illustrate. This assumes you are using the same model
formula with the same starting values and remaining arguments for each
response.
dg - data.frame(x = 1:10, y1 = sort(abs(rnorm(10))),
6 matches
Mail list logo