Thank you for the replies, Uwe and Marc. These are explanations that make
perfect sense. However, shouldn't the behavior of plot.factor include the
option of type = n for consistency with the default plot function?
Best,
Martin
On 21 Apr 2012, at 08:18 , Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Apr 21,
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:25 AM, Martin Renner wrote:
Thank you for the replies, Uwe and Marc. These are explanations that make
perfect sense. However, shouldn't the behavior of plot.factor include the
option of type = n for consistency with the default plot function?
Best,
Martin
I
When plotting a numerical vector against a factor, 'type=n' seems to have no
affect, e.g.
plot (1:10~factor (1:10), type = n)
looks just like
plot (1:10~factor (1:10))
Plotting a numerical against itself works as expected:
plot (1:10, type = n)
I see the same behavior under debian
On Apr 21, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Martin Renner wrote:
When plotting a numerical vector against a factor, 'type=n' seems to have
no affect, e.g.
plot (1:10~factor (1:10), type = n)
looks just like
plot (1:10~factor (1:10))
Plotting a numerical against itself works as expected:
plot
On 21.04.2012 16:49, Martin Renner wrote:
When plotting a numerical vector against a factor, 'type=n' seems to have no
affect, e.g.
plot (1:10~factor (1:10), type = n)
looks just like
plot (1:10~factor (1:10))
This plots 10 boxplots and the data are passed from plot.formula.
5 matches
Mail list logo