On 22/06/19 5:21 AM, Steven Yen wrote:
Unhappy but thanks.
Steven
Well, if you're *really* unhappy (???) you could always do
suppressWarnings(RNGversion("3.5.3"))
Does that make you happier?
cheers,
Rolf
On 6/22/2019 1:13 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 21.06.2019 19:09, Steven Yen
Unhappy but thanks.
Steven
On 6/22/2019 1:13 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
>
> On 21.06.2019 19:09, Steven Yen wrote:
>> Now I see that results were replicated but running RNGversion
>> I get a warning message. Isn't there a way to do this clean?
>
> Well, the old RNG is known to be not optimal, hence
On 21.06.2019 19:09, Steven Yen wrote:
Now I see that results were replicated but running RNGversion
I get a warning message. Isn't there a way to do this clean?
Well, the old RNG is known to be not optimal, hence we give a warning if
you choose the old one. This is the clean way if you
Now I see that results were replicated but running RNGversion
I get a warning message. Isn't there a way to do this clean?
> RNGversion("3.5.3") Warning message: In RNGkind("Mersenne-Twister",
"Inversion", "Rounding") : non-uniform 'Rounding' sampler used
On 6/22/2019 1:03 AM, Uwe Ligges
What does not work?
For me it works under R-3.6.0:
x<-1:500
set.seed(12345671)
j<-sample(1:length(x),size=60); y<-x[j]
summary(j)
RNGversion("3.5.3")
set.seed(12345671)
j<-sample(1:length(x),size=60); y<-x[j]
summary(j)
Now I get the results you got udner the old R.
Best,
Uwe
Thanks. Somewhat of a mystery. The older version I had was R-3.5.3patched.
I cannot get the RNGversion command to run. Can you help? Thanks.
On 6/22/2019 12:25 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
> See the NEWS, the RNG has been changed, use RNGversion
>
> On 21.06.2019 18:10, Steven Yen wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
See the NEWS, the RNG has been changed, use RNGversion
On 21.06.2019 18:10, Steven Yen wrote:
Dear all,
I did all this work with older R (R-3.5.3.patched and older)
but now with R3.6 I cannot replicate the results.
Below I sample 60 observations from 1:500 using the sample command with
a random
7 matches
Mail list logo
