.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 19-Jan-10 Time: 18:41:27
-- XFMail
On 19-Jan-10 18:48:47, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Ted Harding
ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
On 19-Jan-10 17:55:43, Ben Bolker wrote:
kayj kjaja27 at yahoo.com writes:
Hi All,
I was wodering if it is possible to increase the precision using R.
I ran
On 15-Jan-10 08:14:04, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Ted Harding
ted.hard...@manchester.ac.ukwrote:
There is at least one context where the distinction must be
preserved. Example:
pnorm(1.5)
# [1] 0.9331928
pnorm(x=1.5)
# Error in pnorm(x = 1.5) : unused
On 15-Jan-10 09:29:16, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Ted Harding
ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
On 15-Jan-10 08:14:04, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Ted Harding
ted.hard...@manchester.ac.ukwrote:
There is at least one context where
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 14-Jan-10 Time: 11:55:22
-- XFMail --
__
R-help@r-project.org
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 15-Jan-10 Time: 06:57:16
-- XFMail --
__
R
(Y,5,replace=FALSE)
x
# [1] 43 50 18 27 21 83 5 20 32 34 ## (as before)
y
# [1] 14 70 4 66 96## (as before)
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0
is obtained without replacement, however).
I hope this is getting close!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 12-Jan-10 Time: 14:34
[is.na(D)] - 0
D
# 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
# 2 2.1 2.2 0.0 2.4
# 3 3.1 0.0 3.3 3.4
# 4 4.1 0.0 0.0 4.4
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 12-Jan-10
be packages which can work to greater precision,
but I have to leave it to others to describe them (if any).
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 08-Jan-10
[0,1]).
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 08-Jan-10 Time: 18:13:41
-- XFMail
# Jim 43
# David61
Maybe this helps!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 08-Jan-10 Time: 21:53:21
2.1661 3.599 0.00699 **
# b-0.6230 0.4279 -1.456 0.18351
# ---
summary(lm(a~b))$coef[,4]
# (Intercept) b
# 0.006992306 0.183511560
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
.
The result would not be NULL, but can be tested for zero rows.
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 01-Jan-10 Time
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 29-Dec-09 Time: 21:33:10
-- XFMail
of breaks)
histogram(~X | F, breaks=10)
# Explicit specification of break-points:
histogram(~X | F, breaks=0.5*(-6:6))
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date
.
R version 2.10.0 (2009-10-26)
lattice version: 0.17-26 (2009/10/05)
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 26-Dec-09 Time: 20:07
]
On 26-Dec-09 20:38:28, Dennis Murphy wrote:
scales = free, perhaps?
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ted Harding
ted.hard...@manchester.ac.ukwrote:
After answering a previous post by James Rome:
Re: [R] Why do histogram bars vary their width?
I noticed that the lateral axis scales
, so in that case the percentages
were the same as the counts, and hence not diagnostic.
The proper solution (giving rise to the outcome A: which
I describe at the end) is to use type=count.
Apologies for the noise!
Ted.
On 26-Dec-09 22:03:48, Ted Harding wrote:
Thanks, Dennis, that does
as a value, which could be assigned to a variable.
If there were such a way, that would be a very smooth solution!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 23-Dec-09
postings.
I think that solves it for Knut!
Ted.
2009/12/23 Ted Harding ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk:
On 23-Dec-09 11:08:02, Knut Krueger wrote:
Jim Lemon schrieb:
Not as easy as I thought it would be, but:
mlist-as.list(paste(m,1:sample(5:10,1),sep=))
do.call(paste,c(mlist,sep=,))
Hi Jim,
yes
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 23-Dec-09 Time: 18:14:03
-- XFMail --
__
R-help@r
what I'm after is some kind of C or C++ macro expansion,
because the number of loops should not be hard coded.
Thanks for any tips you may have!
Best regards,
baptiste
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax
OOPS!! See correction below!
On 21-Dec-09 08:45:13, Ted Harding wrote:
I wonder whether this answers Baptiste's question as asked.
1: An 8-digit number can have some digits equal to 0;
see Baptiste's comment maxi - 9 # digits from 0 to 9
2: According to the man-page fror blockparts
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 21-Dec-09 Time: 22:13:40
-- XFMail --
__
R
.
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 20-Dec-09 Time: 22:23:26
-- XFMail
-contained, reproducible code.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 15-Dec-09 Time: 13:57:50
-- XFMail
, where dx is
the width of the bin. The total sample size being N, the expected
count for that bin is N*dnorm((x1 - m)/s)*dx.
With this explanation, the above should now be clear!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard
commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 04-Dec-09 Time: 13:02:27
from the Null Hypothesis.
See also Uwe Ligges's remarks ...
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 02-Dec-09 Time: 11:53:22
this option is not available.
--
Charlotte Maia
http://sites.google.com/site/maiagx/home
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 02-Dec-09
explanation.
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 30-Nov-09 Time: 11:27:49
-- XFMail
(density(y),xlim=c(-30,120),ylim=c(0,0.015))
hist(y,freq=FALSE,add=TRUE)
Hoping this helps!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 30-Nov-09
for!
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 28-Nov-09 Time: 22:15:09
-- XFMail
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 26-Nov-09 Time: 20:52:03
-- XFMail --
__
R-help@r
On 26-Nov-09 21:11:02, baptiste auguie wrote:
2009/11/26 Ted Harding ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk:
Raising a rather general question here.
This is a tantalising discussion, but the notion of concave hull
strikes me as extremely ill-defined!
I'd like to see statement of what
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 22-Nov-09 Time: 17:06:08
-- XFMail
]
vecspaces(1:10)
[1]
[8]
--
David
Duncan Murdoch
Cheers,
Peter
(Ted Harding) wrote:
Greetings, All!
I want to draw contour lines in red, using contour(), but also
have
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 19-Nov-09 Time: 11:00:15
-- XFMail
On 19-Nov-09 11:52:57, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Ted Harding
ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
Greetings All.
According to the PLoS (Public Library of Science) Guidelines
for Figure preparation, if a figure is submitted as EPS rather
than TIFF then Figure text
See Addendum at end.
On 19-Nov-09 12:17:54, Ted Harding wrote:
On 19-Nov-09 11:52:57, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Ted Harding
ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
Greetings All.
According to the PLoS (Public Library of Science) Guidelines
for Figure preparation
because the first line was
a complete statement). Putting the else in the same line
as the if means that R knows it is there before executing
the if.
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 17-Nov-09 Time: 23:26:25
-- XFMail --
__
R
, but I hope the above helps!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 16-Nov-09 Time: 12:55:25
-- XFMail
On 16-Nov-09 13:13:27, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On 11/16/09, Ted Harding ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
Not in this case (see below), though of course in general - takes
precedence over ^, so, for example, in the expression
-2^(1/3)
the - is applied first, giving (-2
to proceed in such a case!
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 16-Nov-09 Time: 20:14:52
got lost!
Any advice welcome!
With thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 11-Nov-09 Time: 14:42:21
(0.975,9)
# [1] 2.262157
The second value agrees with your table. Many printed tables give
the two-sided values, rather than the one-sided.
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 06-Nov-09 Time: 08:24:22
-- XFMail
On 01-Nov-09 20:23:30, Peng Yu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Ted Harding
ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
On 20-Oct-09 13:34:49, Peng Yu wrote:
fisher.test() gives a very small p-value, which is underflow on my
machine. However, the log of it should not be underflow. I'm
speciesAA no.subspecies 3
# 3 genusC speciesAAA subspeciesA 2
# 4 genusC speciesAAA subspeciesB 4
Hoping this helps!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 04
speciesAAA subspeciesB25
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 04-Nov-09 Time: 21:47:29
-- XFMail
OPPS^2!! Did it again. The version given below now does seem to work
properly: last line now changed (yet again) to
A$Count - as.numeric(levels(A$Count)[unclass(A$Count)])
On 04-Nov-09 21:47:32, Ted Harding wrote:
OOPS! Sorry, I made an oversight in the code I posted just now
(and I didn't
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 26-Oct-09 Time: 14:28:38
-- XFMail
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 25-Oct-09 Time: 09:30:45
-- XFMail --
__
R-help@r
[Apologies -- I inadvertently omitted an example, essential for
clarity, from the examples below. Now corrected.]
On 25-Oct-09 09:30:51, Ted Harding wrote:
On 25-Oct-09 09:52:42, Patrick Burns wrote:
'The R Inferno' page 59.
Patrick Burns
patr...@burns-stat.com
+44 (0)20 8525 0696
http
this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 24-Oct-09 Time: 21:53:23
-- XFMail
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 22-Oct-09 Time: 19:03:37
-- XFMail --
__
R-help@r-project.org
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 22-Oct-09 Time: 19:57:09
-- XFMail --
__
R-help@r-project.org
hunch is correct.
Cheers,
Peter Ehlers
(Ted Harding) wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have been using contour() to produce some contour plots
(of a spatially-smooted density produced by kde2d()), with
very satisfactory results.
I now want access to the coordinates of the points on the
contours
On 22-Oct-09 19:03:06, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 22/10/2009 2:57 PM, (Ted Harding) wrote:
A follow-up to my previous query.
Say one of the results returned by contourLines() is
C.W - contourLines()
Then C.W is a list of (in this case 28) lists,
each of which is a list
the question: Why the interest in having the value
of such a very small number?
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 20-Oct-09 Time: 15:14:26
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
- function(X){
Table - data.frame( table(X) )
Table$Prop - prop.table( Table$Freq )
Table$CumProp - cumsum( Table$Prop )
Table
}
myTable - mkMyTable(Score)
Hoping this helps!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard
it in fact works, it is not a good idea
to use a function name (sum) as the name of a variable.]
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 14-Oct-09
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 12-Oct-09 Time: 14:32:08
-- XFMail
-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 10-Oct-09 Time: 22:26:16
-- XFMail --
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 09-Oct-09 Time: 22:41:37
-- XFMail
-contained, reproducible code.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 09-Oct-09 Time: 23:00:09
-- XFMail
do wonder just what is going
on then things do not seem to match up as expected!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 30-Sep-09 Time
-7a MIMAT062 Homo sapiens let-7a,
hsa-let-7b MIMAT063 Homo sapiens let-7b,
hsa-let-7c MIMAT064 Homo sapiens let-7c)
sub( .*,,Strings)
# [1] hsa-let-7a hsa-let-7b hsa-let-7c
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding
with identical results if applied to Y - as.data.frame(X)
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 28-Sep-09 Time: 11:11:23
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 28-Sep-09 Time: 13:45:49
-- XFMail
proposal!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 21-Sep-09 Time: 20:32:22
-- XFMail
, withing the domain of logical values, x == y could be either
TRUE or FALSE and we don't know which, so it could be anything
in that domain. Hence x == y returns NA. That's logical ...
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard
?).
The best way would be to able to send this straight from your e-mail
reader into R (e.g. from gmail).
-Johannes
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 19-Sep-09
) the format I describe is clearly enough distinguished.
Ted.
2009/9/19 Ted Harding ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk:
On 19-Sep-09 08:00:18, Cedrick W. Johnson wrote:
At least in windows, if you right click directly in the r console,
there's a command for 'Paste commands only' which may be one
solution
], count[ix]))
8 3976.7 10 3955 12 3972.8 13 3961 15 4008 17 3981.2 20 4029.5 23 3848.3
27 3936.7
But, most of the time, it should just work.
Thanks for the tip. One for my .Rprofile, I think!
Ted.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Ted Harding
ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
On 19-Sep
=17, i=21(maybe).
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 17-Sep-09 Time: 09:47:53
of the kind you seem to be proposing would
certainly not be realistic!
I would be happier thinking about your problem in the context of a
different kind of example ...
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax
such as tiger -- try it! You would still get the warning, and this
time there might even be some point to it ... ).
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 16-Sep-09
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 16-Sep-09 Time: 23:17:28
-- XFMail
] - mu)) / length(ind) / sig2
[1] 1.280317
HTH
Cheers,
Berwin
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 14-Sep-09 Time: 18:20:53
? In that way, it
could resume its rightful place in one's own email inbox. (This
is not the first time I have wished for this).
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 14-Sep-09
On 14-Sep-09 22:30:12, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 14/09/2009 4:32 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Hello
On 9/14/09, Ted Harding ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
This has been sent by software which inserted no line-breaks.
As a result, each paragraph is viewed (by my browser, Firefox)
as one
!
Hoping this helps.
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 13-Sep-09 Time: 19:59:58
-- XFMail
Help and Archive
Search at http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu, searching on contour,
but nothing has leapt obviously to the eye amongst the 494 hits.
With thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 11-Sep-09 Time: 11:53:09
-- XFMail --
__
R-help@r
On 11-Sep-09 14:16:44, Clint Bowman wrote:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 11/09/2009 6:53 AM, (Ted Harding) wrote:
On 11-Sep-09 10:41:21, Jim Lemon wrote:
On 09/11/2009 05:15 PM, Patrick Connolly wrote:
...
|and in previous versions, you could always do M-x cua
On 11-Sep-09 21:02:06, Patrick Connolly wrote:
On Fri, 11-Sep-2009 at 03:46PM +0100, Ted Harding wrote:
[]
| Well, not really!! My point (and certainly Charles Curran's point)
| is that in touch-typing you know by proprioception and
| neuromuscular coordination where your fingers
these files are imported into a PS document using
'groff', the blanking problem described at the end of my included
orifginal posting (below) persisted.
So I posted a summary of the problem to the 'groff' mailing-list.
This can be found in the thread
[Groff] EPS importing problem, Ted Harding, 2009
to substitution of
_ for on the ,art of the mailer.
What do others think?
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 08-Sep-09 Time: 10
On 08-Sep-09 10:40:18, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 08/09/2009 6:09 AM, (Ted Harding) wrote:
Sorry if this is too OT, but there is a particular relevance to
postings to R-help.
Of recent times, I have received several postings via R-help (and some
other mailing-lists) in which the _ character
it. Otherwise no-one
will be able to get past the above!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 08-Sep-09 Time: 14:03:12
)
AplusB
# $index
# [1] 3e+00 2e+01 3e+01 1e+08
# $val
# [1] 0.1 2.2 3.4 4.4
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 08-Sep-09
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 08-Sep-09 Time: 17:12:12
-- XFMail
guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 08-Sep-09
)/
(pnorm(2.0201,2,.24) - pnorm(2.0199,2,.24))
# = -2.873419e-08
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 07-Sep-09 Time: 10:14
)
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 06-Sep-09 Time: 20:45:18
-- XFMail --
__
R-help@r
)==1) ) X - as.matrix(x)
diwish(X)
}
(This may not be optimal, but it gives the idea).
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 05-Sep-09
501 - 600 of 975 matches
Mail list logo