Re: [R] ks.test ; impossible to calculate exact exact value with ex-aequos

2018-12-10 Thread Bert Gunter
"Other than correlation, how to check ressemblence between these two curve" (As Ted Indicated) Graph them... and look! There is nothing magical about statistics, which seems to be what you seek. Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking

Re: [R] ks.test ; impossible to calculate exact exact value with ex-aequos

2018-12-10 Thread Fatma Ell
Thanks a lot for this reply 'a' is a simulated data while 'b' is empirical data. Other than correlation, how to check ressemblence between these two curve in terms of : Amplitude in each row 1...12 Evolution and variability from 1 to 12 Thanks ! Le lundi 10 décembre 2018, Ted Harding a écrit

Re: [R] ks.test ; impossible to calculate exact exact value with ex-aequos

2018-12-10 Thread Ted Harding
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 22:17 +0100, Fatma Ell wrote: > Dear all, > I'm trying to use ks.test in order to compare two curve. I've 0 values i > think this is why I have the follonwing warnings :impossible to calculate > exact exact value with ex-aequos > > a=c(3.02040816326531, 7.95918367346939,

Re: [R] ks.test ; impossible to calculate exact exact value with ex-aequos

2018-12-10 Thread Rui Barradas
Hello, That is a warning, not an error. And it documented. In ?ks.test, section Details, the relevant part is The presence of ties always generates a warning, since continuous distributions do not generate them. If the ties arose from rounding the tests may be approximately valid, but even

[R] ks.test ; impossible to calculate exact exact value with ex-aequos

2018-12-10 Thread Fatma Ell
Dear all, I'm trying to use ks.test in order to compare two curve. I've 0 values i think this is why I have the follonwing warnings :impossible to calculate exact exact value with ex-aequos a=c(3.02040816326531, 7.95918367346939, 10.6162790697674, 4.64150943396226, 1.86538461538462, 1.125,